VS
When evaluating costs, ACAA features a management fee (MER) of 4.2%, compared to 0.18% for XEQT. Performance-wise, ACAA has returned 7.19% year-to-date with -$14 M in net flows, whereas XEQT is at 15.28% with +$10 B. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.
NAV Performance and Flows
Key Data
Compare
ACAA
XEQT
| AuM | $4.92 M | $24,012.75 M |
| Management Fees | 4.20% | 0.18% |
| Exp. ratio | 4.20% | 0.19% |
| Tracking Difference | - | - |
Historical performance and flows
As of November 3, 2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | ACAA | -1.90% | -0.54% | +7.19% | +8.57% | +30.67% |
XEQT | -1.59% | -1.10% | +15.28% | +17.01% | +84.32% | |
| Flows | ACAA | +$0 M | +$1 M | -$14 M | -$14 M | -$3 M |
XEQT | +$1,061 M | +$2,947 M | +$9,698 M | +$10,624 M | +$17,436 M |
ACAA vs XEQT exposure
Countries
ACAA
Exposure data will be available soon
XEQT
Exposure data will be available soon
Sectors
ACAA
Exposure data will be available soon
XEQT
Exposure data will be available soon
As of November 3, 2026
Top 10 Holdings
ACAA
Exposure data will be available soon
XEQT
Exposure data will be available soon
Diversification
ACAA
Exposure data will be available soon
XEQT
Exposure data will be available soon
Characteristics
Compare
ACAA
XEQT
| Provider | Arrow Capital | iShares |
| Management | Actively managed | Actively managed |
| Benchmark | - | - |
| Replication Method | - | - |
| Asset Class | Commodity, Currencies, Equity, Fixed Income | Equity |
| Dividend Policy | Distributing | Distributing |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | 0.00% | 1.59% |
| Meets ESG criteria | No | No |
| Inception Date | November 2, 2022 | August 7, 2019 |
Frequently asked questions about ACAA and XEQT
Which ETF has performed better year to date: ACAA or XEQT?
As of November 3, 2026, ACAA has returned 7.19% year to date, while XEQT has returned 15.28%. XEQT is ahead on YTD performance.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: ACAA or XEQT?
As of November 3, 2026, ACAA manages $4.92 M in assets, while XEQT manages $24.01 B. XEQT is the larger fund by AUM.
How are ACAA and XEQT managed?
ACAA is actively managed by Arrow Capital. It does not track an index. XEQT is actively managed by iShares. It does not track an index.
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: ACAA or XEQT?
Year to date, ACAA has seen -$14.23 M in net flows, compared with +$9,698.28 M for XEQT. XEQT has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of ACAA and XEQT compare?
ACAA has an expense ratio of 4.20%, while XEQT has an expense ratio of 0.19%.
Recent articles about ACAA and XEQT
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.