VS
When evaluating costs, AMAX features a management fee (MER) of 0.65%, compared to 0.08% for ZSP. Performance-wise, AMAX has returned 3.22% year-to-date with +$165 M in net flows, whereas ZSP is at 16.19% with +$1 B. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.
NAV Performance and Flows
Key Data
Compare
AMAX
ZSP
| AuM | $563.79 M | $25,454.20 M |
| Management Fees | 0.65% | 0.08% |
| Exp. ratio | 0.79% | 0.09% |
| Tracking Difference | - | -0.05% |
Historical performance and flows
As of October 20, 2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | AMAX | -9.88% | +16.44% | -3.22% | +0.76% | - |
ZSP | -0.47% | +3.78% | +16.19% | +15.75% | +92.97% | |
| Flows | AMAX | +$26 M | +$70 M | +$165 M | +$195 M | - |
ZSP | +$412 M | +$777 M | +$1,062 M | +$1,848 M | +$5,704 M |
AMAX vs ZSP exposure
Countries
AMAX
Exposure data will be available soon
ZSP
USA
97.65%
Sectors
AMAX
Exposure data will be available soon
ZSP
Technology
45.20%
Finance
13.72%
Healthcare
9.09%
Consumer Non-Cyclicals
8.98%
Industrials
7.57%
Other
15.44%
As of October 20, 2026
Top 10 Holdings
AMAX
Exposure data will be available soon
ZSP
NVIDIA Corp.
7.95%
Apple, Inc.
7.09%
Microsoft Corp.
5.75%
Amazon.com, Inc.
3.93%
Alphabet, Inc.
3.06%
Broadcom Inc.
2.64%
Alphabet, Inc.
2.44%
Meta Platforms, Inc.
1.92%
Micron Technology, Inc.
1.59%
Tesla, Inc.
1.48%
Diversification
AMAX
Exposure data will be available soon
ZSP
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 502 total
37.84%
Characteristics
Compare
AMAX
ZSP
| Provider | Hamilton ETFs | BMO |
| Management | Actively managed | Passively managed |
| Benchmark | - | S&P 500 CAD Total Return Index - CAD |
| Replication Method | - | Direct (Physical) |
| Asset Class | Equity | Equity |
| Dividend Policy | Distributing | Distributing |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | 10.52% | 0.77% |
| Meets ESG criteria | No | No |
| Inception Date | February 6, 2024 | November 14, 2012 |
Frequently asked questions about AMAX and ZSP
Which ETF has performed better year to date: AMAX or ZSP?
As of October 20, 2026, AMAX has returned -3.22% year to date, while ZSP has returned 16.19%. ZSP is ahead on YTD performance.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: AMAX or ZSP?
As of October 20, 2026, AMAX manages $563.79 M in assets, while ZSP manages $25.45 B. ZSP is the larger fund by AUM.
How are AMAX and ZSP managed?
AMAX is actively managed by Hamilton ETFs. It does not track an index. ZSP is passively managed by BMO. It tracks the S&P 500 CAD Total Return Index - CAD benchmark.
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: AMAX or ZSP?
Year to date, AMAX has seen +$164.66 M in net flows, compared with +$1,062.34 M for ZSP. ZSP has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of AMAX and ZSP compare?
AMAX has an expense ratio of 0.79%, while ZSP has an expense ratio of 0.09%.
Recent articles about AMAX and ZSP
Yield-focused ETFs and the Benefit They Can Provide Investors
ETFs that employ covered call-writing strategies can be effective ways to generate monthly yield for investors while still providing exposure to a security or asset class on a long-term basis.
Posted on 6/13/2024 by Kyle Anthony inStock Market
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.