BANK
Evolve Canadian Banks and Lifecos Enhanced Yield Index Fund

Full BANK fund page
VS
UTES
Evolve Canadian Utilities Enhanced Yield Index Fund

Full UTES fund page

Evolve Canadian Banks and Lifecos Enhanced Yield Index Fund (BANK) and Evolve Canadian Utilities Enhanced Yield Index Fund (UTES) offer distinct profiles for Canadian ETF investors. A direct comparison shows that BANK focuses its top 3 sector exposures on Financials, while UTES leans towards Utilities, Energy, and Communication Services. When evaluating costs, BANK features a management fee (MER) of 0.6%, compared to 0.6% for UTES. Performance-wise, BANK has returned 9.81% year-to-date with +$79 M in net flows, whereas UTES is at 7.37% with +$82 M. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.

NAV Performance and Flows

-50510%Mar 24Mar 31Apr 8Apr 15Apr 22

Key Data

Historical performance and flows

As of April 24, 2026
1M3MYTD1Y3Y
Perf.
BANK
+11.29%+10.20%+9.81%+52.71%+67.70%
UTES
-2.73%+5.71%+7.37%+16.72%-
Flows
BANK
-$11 M+$37 M+$79 M+$359 M+$717 M
UTES
+$35 M+$62 M+$82 M+$250 M-

BANK vs UTES exposure

Countries

BANK
Canada
100.26%
UTES
Canada
100.17%

Sectors

BANK
Financials
100.26%
UTES
Utilities
40.77%
Energy
31.24%
Communication Services
28.15%
As of April 24, 2026

Top 10 Holdings

BANK
NATIONAL BANK OF CANADA
10.90%
GREAT WEST LIFECO
10.40%
CDN IMPERIAL BK
10.20%
POWER CORPORATION OF CANADA
10.20%
TORONTO DOMINION
10.10%
SUN LIFE FINL
10.10%
BANK OF MONTREAL
9.83%
ROYAL BK CANADA
9.74%
BNS
9.45%
MANULIFE-S
9.34%
UTES
ALTAGAS
10.83%
ENBRIDGE
10.56%
PEMBINA PIPELINE
10.35%
TC ENERGY CORP
10.33%
ROGERS COMMUNICATIONS
10.07%
EMERA
10.02%
HYDRO ONE
9.97%
FORTIS
9.95%
BCE
9.31%
TELUS
8.78%

Diversification

BANK
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 10 total
100.26%
UTES
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 10 total
100.17%

Characteristics

Compare
BANK
UTES
ProviderEvolve ETFsEvolve ETFs
ManagementActively managedActively managed
Benchmark--
Replication Method
Asset ClassEquityEquity
Dividend PolicyDistributingDistributing
Trailing 12m distribution yield11.13%14.84%
Meets ESG criteriaNoNo
Inception DateFebruary 1, 2022September 3, 2024

Frequently asked questions about BANK and UTES

Which ETF has performed better year to date: BANK or UTES?
As of April 24, 2026, BANK has returned 9.81% year to date, while UTES has returned 7.37%. BANK is ahead on YTD performance.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: BANK or UTES?
As of April 24, 2026, BANK manages $967.19 M in assets, while UTES manages $342.23 M. BANK is the larger fund by AUM.
How are BANK and UTES managed?
BANK is actively managed by Evolve ETFs. It does not track an index. UTES is actively managed by Evolve ETFs. It does not track an index.
What sectors do BANK and UTES emphasize?
BANK is most exposed to Financials. UTES is most exposed to Utilities, Energy, and Communication Services.
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: BANK or UTES?
Year to date, BANK has seen +$79.34 M in net flows, compared with +$81.82 M for UTES. UTES has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of BANK and UTES compare?
BANK has an expense ratio of 0.83%, while UTES has an expense ratio of 0.84%.
What are the top holdings of BANK and UTES?
BANK's largest holdings include NATIONAL BANK OF CANADA, GREAT WEST LIFECO, and CDN IMPERIAL BK. UTES's top holdings include ALTAGAS, ENBRIDGE, and PEMBINA PIPELINE.
Which ETF is more diversified: BANK or UTES?
BANK holds 10 securities, while UTES holds 10. On holdings count, BANK is the more diversified portfolio.

Recent articles about BANK and UTES

CboeTrackinsight
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.

All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
diamonds