VS
When evaluating costs, BANK features a management fee (MER) of 0.6%, compared to 0.6% for UTES. Performance-wise, BANK has returned 30.25% year-to-date with +$295 M in net flows, whereas UTES is at 3.16% with +$222 M. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.
NAV Performance and Flows
Key Data
Compare
BANK
UTES
| AuM | $1,296.60 M | $433.87 M |
| Management Fees | 0.60% | 0.60% |
| Exp. ratio | 0.83% | 0.84% |
| Tracking Difference | - | - |
Historical performance and flows
As of September 16, 2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | BANK | -3.24% | +3.96% | +30.25% | +52.08% | +97.18% |
UTES | -4.03% | -9.80% | +3.16% | +4.30% | - | |
| Flows | BANK | +$23 M | +$161 M | +$295 M | +$425 M | +$905 M |
UTES | +$20 M | +$117 M | +$222 M | +$324 M | - |
BANK vs UTES exposure
Countries
BANK
Exposure data will be available soon
UTES
Exposure data will be available soon
Sectors
BANK
Exposure data will be available soon
UTES
Exposure data will be available soon
As of September 16, 2026
Top 10 Holdings
BANK
Exposure data will be available soon
UTES
Exposure data will be available soon
Diversification
BANK
Exposure data will be available soon
UTES
Exposure data will be available soon
Characteristics
Compare
BANK
UTES
| Provider | Evolve ETFs | Evolve ETFs |
| Management | Actively managed | Actively managed |
| Benchmark | - | - |
| Replication Method | ||
| Asset Class | Equity | Equity |
| Dividend Policy | Distributing | Distributing |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | 12.15% | 18.32% |
| Meets ESG criteria | No | No |
| Inception Date | February 1, 2022 | September 3, 2024 |
Frequently asked questions about BANK and UTES
Which ETF has performed better year to date: BANK or UTES?
As of September 16, 2026, BANK has returned 30.25% year to date, while UTES has returned 3.16%. BANK is ahead on YTD performance.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: BANK or UTES?
As of September 16, 2026, BANK manages $1.30 B in assets, while UTES manages $433.87 M. BANK is the larger fund by AUM.
How are BANK and UTES managed?
BANK is actively managed by Evolve ETFs. It does not track an index. UTES is actively managed by Evolve ETFs. It does not track an index.
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: BANK or UTES?
Year to date, BANK has seen +$295.11 M in net flows, compared with +$222.44 M for UTES. BANK has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of BANK and UTES compare?
BANK has an expense ratio of 0.83%, while UTES has an expense ratio of 0.84%.
Recent articles about BANK and UTES
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.