VS
Compare BMO Global Health Care Fund Active ETF Series (BGHC) vs CI Global Healthcare Leaders Index ETF (CHCL.B) to find the best fit for your portfolio. BGHC and CHCL.B provide the same top sector exposures: Health Care, Consumer Discretionary, and Consumer Staples. When evaluating costs, BGHC features a management fee (MER) of 1.02%, compared to 0.35% for CHCL.B. Performance-wise, BGHC has returned 0.8% year-to-date with +$7 M in net flows, whereas CHCL.B is at 1.05% with -$2 M. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.
NAV Performance and Flows
Key Data
Compare
BGHC
CHCL.B
| AuM | $9.43 M | $87.26 M |
| Management Fees | 1.02% | 0.35% |
| Exp. ratio | 0.82% | 0.37% |
| Tracking Difference | - | - |
Historical performance and flows
As of June 11, 2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | BGHC | +9.21% | +4.30% | +0.80% | +14.50% | - |
CHCL.B | +7.89% | +3.13% | +1.05% | +14.91% | +24.40% | |
| Flows | BGHC | +$1 M | +$1 M | +$7 M | -$112 M | - |
CHCL.B | +$1 M | +$2 M | -$2 M | -$61 M | -$128 M |
BGHC vs CHCL.B exposure
Countries
BGHC
USA
77.24%
Switzerland
9.55%
United Kingdom
7.13%
CHCL.B
USA
70.55%
Switzerland
9.44%
Other
20.01%
Sectors
BGHC
Health Care
87.36%
Other
12.63%
CHCL.B
Health Care
90.18%
Other
8.12%
As of June 11, 2026
Top 10 Holdings
BGHC
LILLY
9.10%
JOHNSON&JOHNSON
7.43%
UNITEDHEALTH GRP
7.29%
ASTRAZENECA
6.43%
ABBVIE
4.82%
MERCK & CO INC
4.69%
US04016X1019
4.48%
UCB
4.40%
MCKESSON
4.23%
NOVARTIS
3.94%
CHCL.B
LILLY
9.93%
JOHNSON&JOHNSON
6.96%
ABBVIE
4.72%
UNITEDHEALTH GRP
4.21%
CH1499059983
3.60%
ASTRAZENECA
3.57%
NOVARTIS
3.54%
MERCK & CO INC
3.41%
AMGEN-T
2.34%
THERMO FISHER SCIENTIFIC
2.26%
Diversification
BGHC
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 120 total
56.80%
CHCL.B
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 149 total
44.52%
Characteristics
Compare
BGHC
CHCL.B
| Provider | BMO | CI |
| Management | Actively managed | Passively managed |
| Benchmark | - | Solactive Developed Markets Healthcare 150 CAD Index (CA NTR) - CAD |
| Replication Method | Direct (Physical) | |
| Asset Class | Equity | Equity |
| Dividend Policy | Distributing | Distributing |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | 0.00% | 1.41% |
| Meets ESG criteria | No | No |
| Inception Date | June 26, 2023 | August 17, 2021 |
Frequently asked questions about BGHC and CHCL.B
Which ETF has performed better year to date: BGHC or CHCL.B?
As of June 11, 2026, BGHC has returned 0.80% year to date, while CHCL.B has returned 1.05%. CHCL.B is ahead on YTD performance.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: BGHC or CHCL.B?
As of June 11, 2026, BGHC manages $9.43 M in assets, while CHCL.B manages $87.26 M. CHCL.B is the larger fund by AUM.
How are BGHC and CHCL.B managed?
BGHC is actively managed by BMO. It does not track an index. CHCL.B is passively managed by CI. It tracks the Solactive Developed Markets Healthcare 150 CAD Index (CA NTR) - CAD benchmark.
What sectors do BGHC and CHCL.B emphasize?
BGHC is most exposed to Health Care, Consumer Discretionary, and Consumer Staples. CHCL.B is most exposed to Health Care, Consumer Discretionary, and Consumer Staples.
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: BGHC or CHCL.B?
Year to date, BGHC has seen +$6.51 M in net flows, compared with -$1.99 M for CHCL.B. BGHC has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of BGHC and CHCL.B compare?
BGHC has an expense ratio of 0.82%, while CHCL.B has an expense ratio of 0.37%.
What are the top holdings of BGHC and CHCL.B?
BGHC's largest holdings include LILLY and JOHNSON&JOHNSON. CHCL.B's top holdings include LILLY and JOHNSON&JOHNSON.
Which ETF is more diversified: BGHC or CHCL.B?
BGHC holds 107 securities, while CHCL.B holds 137. On holdings count, CHCL.B is the more diversified portfolio.
Recent articles about BGHC and CHCL.B
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.