VS
Compare BMO Global Health Care Fund Active ETF Series (BGHC) vs TD Global Healthcare Leaders Index ETF (TDOC) to find the best fit for your portfolio. BGHC provides Health Care, Consumer Discretionary, and Consumer Staples exposures, while TDOC is primarily weighted in Health Care, Consumer Staples, and Information Technology. When evaluating costs, BGHC features a management fee (MER) of 1.02%, compared to 0.35% for TDOC. Performance-wise, BGHC has returned 0.8% year-to-date with +$7 M in net flows, whereas TDOC is at 2.82% with +$30 M. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.
NAV Performance and Flows
Key Data
Compare
BGHC
TDOC
| AuM | $9.43 M | $121.85 M |
| Management Fees | 1.02% | 0.35% |
| Exp. ratio | 0.82% | 0.39% |
| Tracking Difference | - | -0.42% |
Historical performance and flows
As of June 11, 2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | BGHC | +9.21% | +4.30% | +0.80% | +14.50% | - |
TDOC | +5.37% | -0.48% | -2.82% | +6.68% | +15.93% | |
| Flows | BGHC | +$1 M | +$1 M | +$7 M | -$112 M | - |
TDOC | +$15 M | +$21 M | +$30 M | +$39 M | +$72 M |
BGHC vs TDOC exposure
Countries
BGHC
USA
77.24%
Switzerland
9.55%
United Kingdom
7.13%
TDOC
USA
61.08%
Japan
7.94%
Other
30.98%
Sectors
BGHC
Health Care
87.36%
Other
12.63%
TDOC
Health Care
89.63%
Other
9.16%
As of June 11, 2026
Top 10 Holdings
BGHC
LILLY
9.10%
JOHNSON&JOHNSON
7.43%
UNITEDHEALTH GRP
7.29%
ASTRAZENECA
6.43%
ABBVIE
4.82%
MERCK & CO INC
4.69%
US04016X1019
4.48%
UCB
4.40%
MCKESSON
4.23%
NOVARTIS
3.94%
TDOC
JOHNSON&JOHNSON
2.36%
GSK PLC
2.32%
PFIZER
2.31%
UNITEDHEALTH GRP
2.26%
GILEAD SCIENCES
2.23%
NOVARTIS
2.22%
BRISTOL-MYERS SQUIBB
2.22%
MERCK & CO INC
2.21%
MCKESSON
2.19%
AMGEN-T
2.17%
Diversification
BGHC
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 120 total
56.80%
TDOC
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 102 total
22.49%
Characteristics
Compare
BGHC
TDOC
| Provider | BMO | TD Asset Management |
| Management | Actively managed | Passively managed |
| Benchmark | - | Solactive Global Healthcare Leaders Index (CA NTR) - CAD |
| Replication Method | Direct (Physical) | |
| Asset Class | Equity | Equity |
| Dividend Policy | Distributing | Distributing |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | 0.00% | 1.18% |
| Meets ESG criteria | No | No |
| Inception Date | June 26, 2023 | April 14, 2021 |
Frequently asked questions about BGHC and TDOC
Which ETF has performed better year to date: BGHC or TDOC?
As of June 11, 2026, BGHC has returned 0.80% year to date, while TDOC has returned -2.82%. BGHC is ahead on YTD performance.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: BGHC or TDOC?
As of June 11, 2026, BGHC manages $9.43 M in assets, while TDOC manages $121.85 M. TDOC is the larger fund by AUM.
How are BGHC and TDOC managed?
BGHC is actively managed by BMO. It does not track an index. TDOC is passively managed by TD Asset Management. It tracks the Solactive Global Healthcare Leaders Index (CA NTR) - CAD benchmark.
What sectors do BGHC and TDOC emphasize?
BGHC is most exposed to Health Care, Consumer Discretionary, and Consumer Staples. TDOC is most exposed to Health Care, Consumer Staples, and Information Technology.
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: BGHC or TDOC?
Year to date, BGHC has seen +$6.51 M in net flows, compared with +$29.96 M for TDOC. TDOC has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of BGHC and TDOC compare?
BGHC has an expense ratio of 0.82%, while TDOC has an expense ratio of 0.39%.
What are the top holdings of BGHC and TDOC?
BGHC's largest holdings include LILLY and JOHNSON&JOHNSON. TDOC's top holdings include JOHNSON&JOHNSON and GSK PLC.
Which ETF is more diversified: BGHC or TDOC?
BGHC holds 107 securities, while TDOC holds 99. On holdings count, BGHC is the more diversified portfolio.
Recent articles about BGHC and TDOC
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.