VS
When evaluating costs, BGU features a management fee (MER) of 0.7%, compared to 0.06% for QUU. Performance-wise, BGU has returned 4.66% year-to-date with -$28 M in net flows, whereas QUU is at 10.35% with +$2 B. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.
NAV Performance and Flows
Key Data
Compare
BGU
QUU
| AuM | $79.88 M | $7,050.93 M |
| Management Fees | 0.70% | 0.06% |
| Exp. ratio | 0.85% | 0.06% |
| Tracking Difference | - | -0.07% |
Historical performance and flows
As of November 5, 2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | BGU | -3.83% | -5.11% | +4.66% | +3.64% | +43.81% |
QUU | -7.36% | -4.73% | +10.35% | +8.13% | +79.28% | |
| Flows | BGU | +$0 M | -$3 M | -$28 M | -$77 M | -$202 M |
QUU | +$293 M | +$966 M | +$1,639 M | +$1,864 M | +$2,653 M |
BGU vs QUU exposure
Countries
BGU
Exposure data will be available soon
QUU
USA
97.56%
Sectors
BGU
Exposure data will be available soon
QUU
Technology
47.59%
Finance
12.31%
Healthcare
9.34%
Consumer Non-Cyclicals
8.43%
Industrials
7.41%
Other
14.91%
As of November 5, 2026
Top 10 Holdings
BGU
Exposure data will be available soon
QUU
NVIDIA Corp.
8.03%
Apple, Inc.
7.20%
Microsoft Corp.
5.68%
Amazon.com, Inc.
3.62%
Alphabet, Inc.
3.04%
Alphabet, Inc.
2.63%
Broadcom Inc.
2.48%
Meta Platforms, Inc.
2.41%
Micron Technology, Inc.
1.82%
Tesla, Inc.
1.64%
Diversification
BGU
Exposure data will be available soon
QUU
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 503 total
38.55%
Characteristics
Compare
BGU
QUU
| Provider | Bristol Gate | Mackenzie Investments |
| Management | Actively managed | Passively managed |
| Benchmark | - | Solactive US Large Cap Index NTR - CAD |
| Replication Method | - | Direct (Physical) |
| Asset Class | Equity | Equity |
| Dividend Policy | Distributing | Distributing |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | 0.00% | 1.00% |
| Meets ESG criteria | No | No |
| Inception Date | February 21, 2018 | January 24, 2018 |
Frequently asked questions about BGU and QUU
Which ETF has performed better year to date: BGU or QUU?
As of November 5, 2026, BGU has returned 4.66% year to date, while QUU has returned 10.35%. QUU is ahead on YTD performance.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: BGU or QUU?
As of November 5, 2026, BGU manages $79.88 M in assets, while QUU manages $7.05 B. QUU is the larger fund by AUM.
How are BGU and QUU managed?
BGU is actively managed by Bristol Gate. It does not track an index. QUU is passively managed by Mackenzie Investments. It tracks the Solactive US Large Cap Index NTR - CAD benchmark.
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: BGU or QUU?
Year to date, BGU has seen -$27.60 M in net flows, compared with +$1,638.75 M for QUU. QUU has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of BGU and QUU compare?
BGU has an expense ratio of 0.85%, while QUU has an expense ratio of 0.06%.
Recent articles about BGU and QUU
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.