VS
When evaluating costs, BTCC features a management fee (MER) of 1%, compared to 0.22% for VEQT. Performance-wise, BTCC has returned 28.79% year-to-date with -$21 M in net flows, whereas VEQT is at 13.3% with +$4 B. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.
NAV Performance and Flows
Key Data
Compare
BTCC
VEQT
| AuM | $548.35 M | $16,111.17 M |
| Management Fees | 1.00% | 0.22% |
| Exp. ratio | 1.31% | 0.24% |
| Tracking Difference | - | - |
Historical performance and flows
As of July 28, 2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | BTCC | +5.54% | -17.17% | -28.79% | -47.91% | +98.34% |
VEQT | -0.40% | +6.89% | +13.30% | +25.44% | +76.57% | |
| Flows | BTCC | -$4 M | -$12 M | -$21 M | -$21 M | +$50 M |
VEQT | +$607 M | +$1,880 M | +$4,234 M | +$5,751 M | +$9,264 M |
BTCC vs VEQT exposure
Countries
BTCC
Exposure data will be available soon
VEQT
USA
44.29%
Canada
28.47%
Other
27.24%
Sectors
BTCC
Exposure data will be available soon
VEQT
Technology
26.10%
Finance
24.82%
Industrials
9.59%
Non-Energy Materials
7.86%
Other
31.63%
As of July 28, 2026
Top 10 Holdings
BTCC
Exposure data will be available soon
VEQT
NVIDIA Corp.
2.86%
Apple, Inc.
2.64%
Royal Bank of Canada
2.48%
The Toronto-Dominion Bank
1.74%
Microsoft Corp.
1.72%
Amazon.com, Inc.
1.43%
Alphabet, Inc.
1.30%
Shopify, Inc.
1.20%
Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co., Ltd.
1.11%
Broadcom Inc.
1.11%
Diversification
BTCC
Exposure data will be available soon
VEQT
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 12,177 total
17.59%
Characteristics
Compare
BTCC
VEQT
| Provider | Purpose Investments | Vanguard |
| Management | Passively managed | Actively managed |
| Benchmark | CoinDesk Bitcoin Price Index - USD | - |
| Replication Method | Direct (Physical) | |
| Asset Class | Cryptocurrencies | Equity |
| Dividend Policy | No income | Distributing |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | 0.00% | 1.25% |
| Meets ESG criteria | No | No |
| Inception Date | February 11, 2021 | February 5, 2019 |
Frequently asked questions about BTCC and VEQT
Which ETF has performed better year to date: BTCC or VEQT?
As of July 28, 2026, BTCC has returned -28.79% year to date, while VEQT has returned 13.30%. VEQT is ahead on YTD performance.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: BTCC or VEQT?
As of July 28, 2026, BTCC manages $548.35 M in assets, while VEQT manages $16.11 B. VEQT is the larger fund by AUM.
How are BTCC and VEQT managed?
BTCC is passively managed by Purpose Investments. It tracks the CoinDesk Bitcoin Price Index - USD benchmark. VEQT is actively managed by Vanguard. It does not track an index.
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: BTCC or VEQT?
Year to date, BTCC has seen -$20.54 M in net flows, compared with +$4,234.34 M for VEQT. VEQT has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of BTCC and VEQT compare?
BTCC has an expense ratio of 1.31%, while VEQT has an expense ratio of 0.24%.
Recent articles about BTCC and VEQT
ETF Comparison: XEQT vs. VEQT
A side-by-side comparison of XEQT and VEQT, Canada's two leading all-equity portfolio ETFs.
Posted on 7/22/2026 by Kyle Anthony inEquities
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.