When evaluating costs, BTCC.B features a management fee (MER) of 1%, compared to 0.08% for ZSP. Performance-wise, BTCC.B has returned 11.69% year-to-date with -$89 M in net flows, whereas ZSP is at 14.45% with +$633 M. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.
NAV Performance and Flows
Key Data
Compare
BTCC.B
ZSP
| AuM | $935.08 M | $24,700.38 M |
| Management Fees | 1.00% | 0.08% |
| Exp. ratio | 1.31% | 0.09% |
| Tracking Difference | - | -0.25% |
Historical performance and flows
As of September 17, 2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | BTCC.B | +19.96% | +17.66% | -11.69% | -33.64% | +184.25% |
ZSP | -0.47% | +2.21% | +14.45% | +18.61% | +83.39% | |
| Flows | BTCC.B | +$2 M | -$3 M | -$89 M | -$150 M | -$615 M |
ZSP | +$326 M | +$10 M | +$633 M | +$1,401 M | +$5,355 M |
BTCC.B vs ZSP exposure
Countries
BTCC.B
Exposure data will be available soon
ZSP
USA
97.56%
Sectors
BTCC.B
Exposure data will be available soon
ZSP
Technology
44.85%
Finance
14.06%
Healthcare
8.98%
Consumer Non-Cyclicals
8.97%
Industrials
7.87%
Other
15.28%
As of September 17, 2026
Top 10 Holdings
BTCC.B
Exposure data will be available soon
ZSP
Apple, Inc.
7.66%
NVIDIA Corp.
7.39%
Microsoft Corp.
5.24%
Amazon.com, Inc.
3.61%
Alphabet, Inc.
3.07%
Broadcom Inc.
2.88%
Alphabet, Inc.
2.47%
Meta Platforms, Inc.
1.85%
Micron Technology, Inc.
1.55%
JPMorgan Chase & Co.
1.47%
Diversification
BTCC.B
Exposure data will be available soon
ZSP
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 502 total
37.19%
Characteristics
Compare
BTCC.B
ZSP
| Provider | Purpose Investments | BMO |
| Management | Passively managed | Passively managed |
| Benchmark | CoinDesk Bitcoin Price Index - USD | S&P 500 CAD Total Return Index - CAD |
| Replication Method | Direct (Physical) | Direct (Physical) |
| Asset Class | Cryptocurrencies | Equity |
| Dividend Policy | No income | Distributing |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | 0.00% | 0.76% |
| Meets ESG criteria | No | No |
| Inception Date | February 18, 2021 | November 14, 2012 |
Frequently asked questions about BTCC.B and ZSP
Which ETF has performed better year to date: BTCC.B or ZSP?
As of September 17, 2026, BTCC.B has returned -11.69% year to date, while ZSP has returned 14.45%. ZSP is ahead on YTD performance.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: BTCC.B or ZSP?
As of September 17, 2026, BTCC.B manages $935.08 M in assets, while ZSP manages $24.70 B. ZSP is the larger fund by AUM.
How are BTCC.B and ZSP managed?
BTCC.B is passively managed by Purpose Investments. It tracks the CoinDesk Bitcoin Price Index - USD benchmark. ZSP is passively managed by BMO. It tracks the S&P 500 CAD Total Return Index - CAD benchmark.
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: BTCC.B or ZSP?
Year to date, BTCC.B has seen -$89.29 M in net flows, compared with +$632.95 M for ZSP. ZSP has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of BTCC.B and ZSP compare?
BTCC.B has an expense ratio of 1.31%, while ZSP has an expense ratio of 0.09%.
Recent articles about BTCC.B and ZSP
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.