VS
When evaluating costs, CBCX features a management fee (MER) of 0.5%, compared to 0.45% for FCIQ. Performance-wise, CBCX has returned 16.23% year-to-date with +$0 M in net flows, whereas FCIQ is at 17.41% with +$547 M. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.
NAV Performance and Flows
Key Data
Compare
CBCX
FCIQ
| AuM | $5.11 M | $2,087.21 M |
| Management Fees | 0.50% | 0.45% |
| Exp. ratio | 0.58% | 0.51% |
| Tracking Difference | -0.25% | -0.89% |
Historical performance and flows
As of October 30, 2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | CBCX | -23.96% | -14.33% | -16.23% | -40.64% | +210.93% |
FCIQ | +1.08% | +2.00% | +17.41% | +15.55% | +69.84% | |
| Flows | CBCX | +$0 M | +$0 M | +$0 M | +$0 M | +$2 M |
FCIQ | +$44 M | +$120 M | +$547 M | +$629 M | +$1,242 M |
CBCX vs FCIQ exposure
Countries
CBCX
USA
79.14%
Singapore
7.06%
Other
13.80%
FCIQ
Exposure data will be available soon
Sectors
CBCX
Finance
82.92%
Technology
16.73%
FCIQ
Exposure data will be available soon
As of October 30, 2026
Top 10 Holdings
CBCX
Forward Industries, Inc.
4.21%
Twenty One Capital, Inc.
4.15%
Strategy, Inc.
4.15%
Canaan, Inc.
3.89%
Hyperliquid Strategies, Inc.
3.88%
Sharplink, Inc.
3.83%
Strive, Inc. (United States)
3.81%
Bitmine Immersion Technologies, Inc.
3.80%
Metaplanet, Inc.
3.77%
Coinbase Global, Inc.
3.77%
FCIQ
Exposure data will be available soon
Diversification
CBCX
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 44 total
39.27%
FCIQ
Exposure data will be available soon
Characteristics
Compare
CBCX
FCIQ
| Provider | CI | Fidelity |
| Management | Passively managed | Passively managed |
| Benchmark | Alerian Galaxy Global Cryptocurrency-Focused Blockchain Equity Hedged to CAD Dollars Index - CAD | Fidelity Canada International High Quality GTR Index - CAD |
| Replication Method | Direct (Physical) | Direct (Physical) |
| Asset Class | Equity | Equity |
| Dividend Policy | Distributing | Distributing |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | 0.00% | 1.13% |
| Meets ESG criteria | No | No |
| Inception Date | April 28, 2022 | January 24, 2019 |
Frequently asked questions about CBCX and FCIQ
Which ETF has performed better year to date: CBCX or FCIQ?
As of October 30, 2026, CBCX has returned -16.23% year to date, while FCIQ has returned 17.41%. FCIQ is ahead on YTD performance.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: CBCX or FCIQ?
As of October 30, 2026, CBCX manages $5.11 M in assets, while FCIQ manages $2.09 B. FCIQ is the larger fund by AUM.
How are CBCX and FCIQ managed?
CBCX is passively managed by CI. It tracks the Alerian Galaxy Global Cryptocurrency-Focused Blockchain Equity Hedged to CAD Dollars Index - CAD benchmark. FCIQ is passively managed by Fidelity. It tracks the Fidelity Canada International High Quality GTR Index - CAD benchmark.
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: CBCX or FCIQ?
Year to date, CBCX has seen +$0.00 M in net flows, compared with +$547.10 M for FCIQ. FCIQ has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of CBCX and FCIQ compare?
CBCX has an expense ratio of 0.58%, while FCIQ has an expense ratio of 0.51%.
Recent articles about CBCX and FCIQ
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.