VS
CI Digital Security ETF (CBUG) and iShares Semiconductor Index ETF (XCHP) offer distinct profiles for Canadian ETF investors. A direct comparison shows that CBUG focuses its top 3 sector exposures on Technology, Business Services, and Healthcare, while XCHP leans towards Technology. When evaluating costs, CBUG features a management fee (MER) of 0.4%, compared to 0.35% for XCHP. Performance-wise, CBUG has returned 28.59% year-to-date with -$2 M in net flows, whereas XCHP is at 76.99% with +$198 M. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.
NAV Performance and Flows
Key Data
Compare
CBUG
XCHP
| AuM | $4.05 M | $304.36 M |
| Management Fees | 0.40% | 0.35% |
| Exp. ratio | 0.47% | 0.39% |
| Tracking Difference | -1.36% | - |
Historical performance and flows
As of July 17, 2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | CBUG | +9.69% | +34.47% | +28.59% | +27.28% | +100.04% |
XCHP | -13.08% | +28.56% | +76.99% | +115.94% | - | |
| Flows | CBUG | +$0 M | -$0 M | -$2 M | -$0 M | -$15 M |
XCHP | +$55 M | +$159 M | +$198 M | +$190 M | - |
CBUG vs XCHP exposure
Countries
CBUG
USA
85.53%
Other
14.47%
XCHP
USA
85.27%
Other
14.73%
Sectors
CBUG
Technology
96.79%
XCHP
Technology
99.86%
As of July 17, 2026
Top 10 Holdings
CBUG
Palo Alto Networks, Inc.
10.78%
Fortinet, Inc.
7.19%
Akamai Technologies, Inc.
6.13%
CrowdStrike Holdings, Inc.
5.98%
Okta, Inc.
5.74%
Hewlett Packard Enterprise Co.
5.42%
Alphabet, Inc.
5.08%
Broadcom Inc.
4.88%
BlackBerry Ltd.
4.24%
TD SYNNEX Corp.
3.88%
XCHP
Micron Technology, Inc.
11.62%
Advanced Micro Devices, Inc.
9.48%
Broadcom Inc.
6.90%
Intel Corp.
6.20%
Marvell Technology, Inc.
6.19%
NVIDIA Corp.
5.88%
Applied Materials, Inc.
4.45%
QUALCOMM, Inc.
4.35%
Texas Instruments Incorporated
3.55%
NXP Semiconductors NV
3.49%
Diversification
CBUG
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 38 total
59.31%
XCHP
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 30 total
62.12%
Characteristics
Compare
CBUG
XCHP
| Provider | CI | iShares |
| Management | Passively managed | Passively managed |
| Benchmark | Solactive Digital Security Index NTR - CAD Hedged | NYSE Semiconductor Index - USD |
| Replication Method | Direct (Physical) | Direct (Physical) |
| Asset Class | Equity | Equity |
| Dividend Policy | - | Distributing |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | 0.06% | 0.17% |
| Meets ESG criteria | No | No |
| Inception Date | March 1, 2022 | September 6, 2023 |
Frequently asked questions about CBUG and XCHP
Which ETF has performed better year to date: CBUG or XCHP?
As of July 17, 2026, CBUG has returned 28.59% year to date, while XCHP has returned 76.99%. XCHP is ahead on YTD performance.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: CBUG or XCHP?
As of July 17, 2026, CBUG manages $4.05 M in assets, while XCHP manages $304.36 M. XCHP is the larger fund by AUM.
How are CBUG and XCHP managed?
CBUG is passively managed by CI. It tracks the Solactive Digital Security Index NTR - CAD Hedged benchmark. XCHP is passively managed by iShares. It tracks the NYSE Semiconductor Index - USD benchmark.
What sectors do CBUG and XCHP emphasize?
CBUG is most exposed to Technology, Business Services, and Healthcare. XCHP is most exposed to Technology.
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: CBUG or XCHP?
Year to date, CBUG has seen -$1.74 M in net flows, compared with +$198.39 M for XCHP. XCHP has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of CBUG and XCHP compare?
CBUG has an expense ratio of 0.47%, while XCHP has an expense ratio of 0.39%.
What are the top holdings of CBUG and XCHP?
CBUG's largest holdings include Palo Alto Networks, Inc., Fortinet, Inc., and Akamai Technologies, Inc.. XCHP's top holdings include Micron Technology, Inc., Advanced Micro Devices, Inc., and Broadcom Inc..
Which ETF is more diversified: CBUG or XCHP?
CBUG holds 38 securities, while XCHP holds 30. On holdings count, CBUG is the more diversified portfolio.
Recent articles about CBUG and XCHP
Tech ETFs Plunge Amid Nasdaq-100 and S&P500 Decline
US markets fell sharply this week, with tech ETFs leading the decline. The S&P500 and Nasdaq 100 suffered heavy losses as semiconductor stocks came under acute pressure, dragging the tech sector down.
Posted on 9/9/2024 by ETF Market Canada inTechnology
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.