ETF Market Canada › ETF Comparison › CCCB vs ZWB

CCCB vs ZWB ETF Comparison

ENFR
With ETF data and analysis by
Cboe
Back to Cboe homepageFR
CCCB
CIBC Canadian Banks Covered Call ETF
Full CCCB fund page
VS
ZWB
BMO Covered Call Canadian Banks ETF
Full ZWB fund page

CIBC Canadian Banks Covered Call ETF (CCCB) and BMO Covered Call Canadian Banks ETF (ZWB) offer distinct profiles for Canadian ETF investors. A direct comparison shows that CCCB focuses its top 3 sector exposures on Finance, while ZWB leans towards Finance. When evaluating costs, CCCB features a management fee (MER) of 0.35%, compared to 0.65% for ZWB. Performance-wise, CCCB has returned 26.72% year-to-date with +$4 M in net flows, whereas ZWB is at 26.18% with +$53 M. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.

NAV Performance and Flows

-1.00.01.02.03.04.0%Jun 29Jul 7Jul 14Jul 21Jul 28

Key Data

Historical performance and flows

As of July 29, 2026
1M3MYTD1Y3Y
Perf.
CCCB
-0.60%+14.76%+26.72%--
ZWB
-0.42%+14.93%+26.18%+54.20%+105.56%
Flows
CCCB
+$1 M+$2 M+$4 M--
ZWB
+$45 M+$40 M+$53 M+$43 M-$207 M

CCCB vs ZWB exposure

Countries

CCCB
Canada
99.86%
ZWB
Canada
100.22%

Sectors

CCCB
Finance
99.86%
ZWB
Finance
100.22%
As of July 29, 2026

Top 10 Holdings

CCCB
Bank of Montreal
16.86%
Royal Bank of Canada
16.86%
Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce
16.71%
The Toronto-Dominion Bank
16.69%
National Bank of Canada
16.47%
The Bank of Nova Scotia
16.26%
ZWB
Bank of Montreal
17.32%
The Toronto-Dominion Bank
17.30%
Royal Bank of Canada
17.03%
The Bank of Nova Scotia
16.71%
National Bank of Canada
15.99%
Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce
15.86%

Diversification

CCCB
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 6 total
99.86%
ZWB
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 6 total
100.22%

Characteristics

Compare
CCCB
ZWB
ProviderCIBCBMO
ManagementActively managedActively managed
Benchmark--
Replication Method
Asset ClassEquityEquity
Dividend PolicyDistributingDistributing
Trailing 12m distribution yield-4.78%
Meets ESG criteriaNoNo
Inception DateAugust 25, 2025January 28, 2011

Frequently asked questions about CCCB and ZWB

Which ETF has performed better year to date: CCCB or ZWB?
As of July 29, 2026, CCCB has returned 26.72% year to date, while ZWB has returned 26.18%. CCCB is ahead on YTD performance.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: CCCB or ZWB?
As of July 29, 2026, CCCB manages $9.00 M in assets, while ZWB manages $4.71 B. ZWB is the larger fund by AUM.
How are CCCB and ZWB managed?
CCCB is actively managed by CIBC. It does not track an index. ZWB is actively managed by BMO. It does not track an index.
What sectors do CCCB and ZWB emphasize?
CCCB is most exposed to Finance. ZWB is most exposed to Finance.
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: CCCB or ZWB?
Year to date, CCCB has seen +$4.08 M in net flows, compared with +$53.30 M for ZWB. ZWB has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of CCCB and ZWB compare?
CCCB has an expense ratio of 0.35%, while ZWB has an expense ratio of 0.72%.
What are the top holdings of CCCB and ZWB?
CCCB's largest holdings include Bank of Montreal, Royal Bank of Canada, and Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce. ZWB's top holdings include Bank of Montreal, The Toronto-Dominion Bank, and Royal Bank of Canada.
Which ETF is more diversified: CCCB or ZWB?
CCCB holds 6 securities, while ZWB holds 6. On holdings count, CCCB is the more diversified portfolio.

Recent articles about CCCB and ZWB

CboeTrackinsight
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.

All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
diamonds