VS
Compare CI Global Sustainable Infrastructure Fund (CGRN) vs CI Global Sustainable Infrastructure Fund (CGRN.U) to find the best fit for your portfolio. CGRN and CGRN.U provide the same top sector exposures: Utilities, Industrials, and Energy. When evaluating costs, CGRN features a management fee (MER) of 0.7%, compared to 0.7% for CGRN.U. Performance-wise, CGRN has returned 9.7% year-to-date with +$1 M in net flows, whereas CGRN.U is at 11.03% with +$0 M. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.
NAV Performance and Flows
Key Data
Compare
CGRN
CGRN.U
| AuM | $2.67 M | $1.98 M |
| Management Fees | 0.70% | 0.70% |
| Exp. ratio | 0.99% | 0.97% |
| Tracking Difference | - | - |
Historical performance and flows
As of October 19, 2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | CGRN | -1.07% | -3.62% | +9.70% | +4.06% | +59.39% |
CGRN.U | -0.93% | -3.25% | +11.03% | +5.71% | +65.77% | |
| Flows | CGRN | +$0 M | +$0 M | +$1 M | +$1 M | +$1 M |
CGRN.U | +$0 M | +$0 M | +$0 M | +$0 M | +$0 M |
CGRN vs CGRN.U exposure
Countries
CGRN
USA
24.85%
Canada
17.90%
France
11.36%
Other
45.89%
CGRN.U
USA
24.85%
Canada
17.90%
France
11.36%
Other
45.89%
Sectors
CGRN
Utilities
50.35%
Industrials
29.63%
Energy
10.30%
Other
9.72%
CGRN.U
Utilities
50.35%
Industrials
29.63%
Energy
10.30%
Other
9.72%
As of October 19, 2026
Top 10 Holdings
CGRN
Quanta Services, Inc.
4.40%
Royal Vopak NV
4.07%
Northland Power, Inc.
3.90%
RWE AG
3.78%
Fortum Oyj
3.63%
CSX Corp.
3.60%
EDP SA
3.58%
APA Group
3.45%
Centrica Plc
3.31%
Ørsted A/S
3.15%
CGRN.U
Quanta Services, Inc.
4.40%
Royal Vopak NV
4.07%
Northland Power, Inc.
3.90%
RWE AG
3.78%
Fortum Oyj
3.63%
CSX Corp.
3.60%
EDP SA
3.58%
APA Group
3.45%
Centrica Plc
3.31%
Ørsted A/S
3.15%
Diversification
CGRN
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 35 total
36.88%
CGRN.U
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 35 total
36.88%
Characteristics
Frequently asked questions about CGRN and CGRN.U
Which ETF has performed better year to date: CGRN or CGRN.U?
As of October 19, 2026, CGRN has returned 9.70% year to date, while CGRN.U has returned 11.03%. CGRN.U is ahead on YTD performance.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: CGRN or CGRN.U?
As of October 19, 2026, CGRN manages $2.67 M in assets, while CGRN.U manages $1.98 M. CGRN is the larger fund by AUM.
How are CGRN and CGRN.U managed?
CGRN is actively managed by CI. It does not track an index. CGRN.U is actively managed by CI. It does not track an index.
What sectors do CGRN and CGRN.U emphasize?
CGRN is most exposed to Utilities, Industrials, and Energy. CGRN.U is most exposed to Utilities, Industrials, and Energy.
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: CGRN or CGRN.U?
Year to date, CGRN has seen +$0.71 M in net flows, compared with +$0.00 M for CGRN.U. CGRN has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of CGRN and CGRN.U compare?
CGRN has an expense ratio of 0.99%, while CGRN.U has an expense ratio of 0.97%.
What are the top holdings of CGRN and CGRN.U?
CGRN's largest holdings include Quanta Services, Inc., Royal Vopak NV, and Northland Power, Inc.. CGRN.U's top holdings include Quanta Services, Inc., Royal Vopak NV, and Northland Power, Inc..
Which ETF is more diversified: CGRN or CGRN.U?
CGRN holds 35 securities, while CGRN.U holds 35. On holdings count, CGRN is the more diversified portfolio.
Recent articles about CGRN and CGRN.U
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.