VS
Compare CI Global Sustainable Infrastructure Fund (CGRN) vs AGF Systematic Global Infrastructure ETF (QIF) to find the best fit for your portfolio. CGRN and QIF provide the same top sector exposures: Utilities, Industrials, and Energy. When evaluating costs, CGRN features a management fee (MER) of 0.7%, compared to 0.45% for QIF. Performance-wise, CGRN has returned 9.63% year-to-date with +$1 M in net flows, whereas QIF is at 7.68% with -$7 M. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.
NAV Performance and Flows
Key Data
Compare
CGRN
QIF
| AuM | $2.67 M | $141.02 M |
| Management Fees | 0.70% | 0.45% |
| Exp. ratio | 0.99% | 0.45% |
| Tracking Difference | - | - |
Historical performance and flows
As of October 20, 2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | CGRN | -1.13% | -3.68% | +9.63% | +3.99% | +60.93% |
QIF | +0.64% | -4.97% | +7.68% | +4.19% | +61.40% | |
| Flows | CGRN | +$0 M | +$0 M | +$1 M | +$1 M | +$1 M |
QIF | -$0 M | +$3 M | -$7 M | -$2 M | -$130 M |
CGRN vs QIF exposure
Countries
CGRN
USA
24.85%
Canada
17.90%
France
11.36%
Other
45.89%
QIF
USA
50.17%
Spain
12.48%
Canada
9.54%
Other
27.80%
Sectors
CGRN
Utilities
50.35%
Industrials
29.63%
Energy
10.30%
Other
9.72%
QIF
Utilities
47.54%
Industrials
20.39%
Energy
19.28%
Other
12.80%
As of October 20, 2026
Top 10 Holdings
CGRN
Quanta Services, Inc.
4.40%
Royal Vopak NV
4.07%
Northland Power, Inc.
3.90%
RWE AG
3.78%
Fortum Oyj
3.63%
CSX Corp.
3.60%
EDP SA
3.58%
APA Group
3.45%
Centrica Plc
3.31%
Ørsted A/S
3.15%
QIF
Iberdrola SA
5.84%
Enbridge, Inc.
4.99%
Aena S.M.E. SA
4.62%
NextEra Energy, Inc.
3.31%
Enel SpA
3.03%
Constellation Energy Corp.
2.52%
TC Energy Corp.
2.46%
Kinder Morgan, Inc.
2.43%
Duke Energy Corp.
2.39%
Entergy Corp.
2.25%
Diversification
CGRN
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 35 total
36.88%
QIF
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 83 total
33.83%
Characteristics
Frequently asked questions about CGRN and QIF
Which ETF has performed better year to date: CGRN or QIF?
As of October 20, 2026, CGRN has returned 9.63% year to date, while QIF has returned 7.68%. CGRN is ahead on YTD performance.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: CGRN or QIF?
As of October 20, 2026, CGRN manages $2.67 M in assets, while QIF manages $141.02 M. QIF is the larger fund by AUM.
How are CGRN and QIF managed?
CGRN is actively managed by CI. It does not track an index. QIF is actively managed by AGF. It does not track an index.
What sectors do CGRN and QIF emphasize?
CGRN is most exposed to Utilities, Industrials, and Energy. QIF is most exposed to Utilities, Industrials, and Energy.
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: CGRN or QIF?
Year to date, CGRN has seen +$0.71 M in net flows, compared with -$7.22 M for QIF. CGRN has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of CGRN and QIF compare?
CGRN has an expense ratio of 0.99%, while QIF has an expense ratio of 0.45%.
What are the top holdings of CGRN and QIF?
CGRN's largest holdings include Quanta Services, Inc., Royal Vopak NV, and Northland Power, Inc.. QIF's top holdings include Iberdrola SA, Enbridge, Inc., and Aena S.M.E. SA.
Which ETF is more diversified: CGRN or QIF?
CGRN holds 35 securities, while QIF holds 83. On holdings count, QIF is the more diversified portfolio.
Recent articles about CGRN and QIF
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.