VS
Compare CI Global Sustainable Infrastructure Fund (CGRN) vs TD Active Global Infrastructure Equity ETF (TINF) to find the best fit for your portfolio. CGRN and TINF provide the same top sector exposures: Utilities, Industrials, and Energy. When evaluating costs, CGRN features a management fee (MER) of 0.7%, compared to 0.65% for TINF. Performance-wise, CGRN has returned 9.7% year-to-date with +$1 M in net flows, whereas TINF is at 6.96% with +$202 M. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.
NAV Performance and Flows
Key Data
Compare
CGRN
TINF
| AuM | $2.67 M | $475.43 M |
| Management Fees | 0.70% | 0.65% |
| Exp. ratio | 0.99% | 0.73% |
| Tracking Difference | - | - |
Historical performance and flows
As of October 19, 2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | CGRN | -1.07% | -3.62% | +9.70% | +4.06% | +59.39% |
TINF | +0.09% | -6.07% | +6.96% | +4.03% | +63.37% | |
| Flows | CGRN | +$0 M | +$0 M | +$1 M | +$1 M | +$1 M |
TINF | +$10 M | +$53 M | +$202 M | +$233 M | +$320 M |
CGRN vs TINF exposure
Countries
CGRN
USA
24.85%
Canada
17.90%
France
11.36%
Other
45.89%
TINF
USA
36.96%
Spain
15.08%
Canada
9.32%
Other
38.63%
Sectors
CGRN
Utilities
50.35%
Industrials
29.63%
Energy
10.30%
Other
9.72%
TINF
Utilities
42.48%
Industrials
32.73%
Energy
23.33%
As of October 19, 2026
Top 10 Holdings
CGRN
Quanta Services, Inc.
4.40%
Royal Vopak NV
4.07%
Northland Power, Inc.
3.90%
RWE AG
3.78%
Fortum Oyj
3.63%
CSX Corp.
3.60%
EDP SA
3.58%
APA Group
3.45%
Centrica Plc
3.31%
Ørsted A/S
3.15%
TINF
Aena S.M.E. SA
6.27%
Iberdrola SA
5.66%
NextEra Energy, Inc.
5.14%
The Williams Cos., Inc.
4.89%
Enbridge, Inc.
3.83%
TC Energy Corp.
3.32%
The Southern Co.
3.18%
Cheniere Energy, Inc.
3.05%
American Electric Power Co., Inc.
3.03%
National Grid Plc
2.98%
Diversification
CGRN
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 35 total
36.88%
TINF
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 51 total
41.35%
Characteristics
Compare
CGRN
TINF
| Provider | CI | TD Asset Management |
| Management | Actively managed | Actively managed |
| Benchmark | - | - |
| Replication Method | - | - |
| Asset Class | Equity | Equity |
| Dividend Policy | Distributing | Distributing |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | 2.25% | 2.08% |
| Meets ESG criteria | Yes | No |
| Inception Date | September 22, 2022 | June 2, 2020 |
Frequently asked questions about CGRN and TINF
Which ETF has performed better year to date: CGRN or TINF?
As of October 19, 2026, CGRN has returned 9.70% year to date, while TINF has returned 6.96%. CGRN is ahead on YTD performance.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: CGRN or TINF?
As of October 19, 2026, CGRN manages $2.67 M in assets, while TINF manages $475.43 M. TINF is the larger fund by AUM.
How are CGRN and TINF managed?
CGRN is actively managed by CI. It does not track an index. TINF is actively managed by TD Asset Management. It does not track an index.
What sectors do CGRN and TINF emphasize?
CGRN is most exposed to Utilities, Industrials, and Energy. TINF is most exposed to Utilities, Industrials, and Energy.
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: CGRN or TINF?
Year to date, CGRN has seen +$0.71 M in net flows, compared with +$202.16 M for TINF. TINF has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of CGRN and TINF compare?
CGRN has an expense ratio of 0.99%, while TINF has an expense ratio of 0.73%.
What are the top holdings of CGRN and TINF?
CGRN's largest holdings include Quanta Services, Inc., Royal Vopak NV, and Northland Power, Inc.. TINF's top holdings include Aena S.M.E. SA, Iberdrola SA, and NextEra Energy, Inc..
Which ETF is more diversified: CGRN or TINF?
CGRN holds 35 securities, while TINF holds 51. On holdings count, TINF is the more diversified portfolio.
Recent articles about CGRN and TINF
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.