VS
Compare CI Global Sustainable Infrastructure Fund (CGRN) vs Vanguard All-Equity ETF Portfolio (VEQT) to find the best fit for your portfolio. CGRN provides Utilities, Industrials, and Energy exposures, while VEQT is primarily weighted in Technology, Finance, and Industrials. When evaluating costs, CGRN features a management fee (MER) of 0.7%, compared to 0.22% for VEQT. Performance-wise, CGRN has returned 9.63% year-to-date with +$1 M in net flows, whereas VEQT is at 15.31% with +$6 B. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.
NAV Performance and Flows
Key Data
Compare
CGRN
VEQT
| AuM | $2.67 M | $17,819.22 M |
| Management Fees | 0.70% | 0.22% |
| Exp. ratio | 0.99% | 0.24% |
| Tracking Difference | - | - |
Historical performance and flows
As of October 20, 2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | CGRN | -1.13% | -3.68% | +9.63% | +3.99% | +60.93% |
VEQT | -1.19% | +2.71% | +15.31% | +16.56% | +91.26% | |
| Flows | CGRN | +$0 M | +$0 M | +$1 M | +$1 M | +$1 M |
VEQT | +$515 M | +$1,638 M | +$5,661 M | +$6,408 M | +$10,543 M |
CGRN vs VEQT exposure
Countries
CGRN
USA
24.85%
Canada
17.90%
France
11.36%
Other
45.89%
VEQT
USA
44.50%
Canada
29.55%
Other
25.95%
Sectors
CGRN
Utilities
50.35%
Industrials
29.63%
Energy
10.30%
Other
9.72%
VEQT
Technology
25.22%
Finance
25.20%
Industrials
9.16%
Non-Energy Materials
8.97%
Energy
7.65%
Other
23.80%
As of October 20, 2026
Top 10 Holdings
CGRN
Quanta Services, Inc.
4.40%
Royal Vopak NV
4.07%
Northland Power, Inc.
3.90%
RWE AG
3.78%
Fortum Oyj
3.63%
CSX Corp.
3.60%
EDP SA
3.58%
APA Group
3.45%
Centrica Plc
3.31%
Ørsted A/S
3.15%
VEQT
NVIDIA Corp.
3.08%
Apple, Inc.
2.82%
Royal Bank of Canada
2.37%
Microsoft Corp.
2.28%
The Toronto-Dominion Bank
1.68%
Amazon.com, Inc.
1.52%
Shopify, Inc.
1.50%
Alphabet, Inc.
1.21%
Broadcom Inc.
1.06%
Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co., Ltd.
1.03%
Diversification
CGRN
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 35 total
36.88%
VEQT
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 12,159 total
18.55%
Characteristics
Frequently asked questions about CGRN and VEQT
Which ETF has performed better year to date: CGRN or VEQT?
As of October 20, 2026, CGRN has returned 9.63% year to date, while VEQT has returned 15.31%. VEQT is ahead on YTD performance.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: CGRN or VEQT?
As of October 20, 2026, CGRN manages $2.67 M in assets, while VEQT manages $17.82 B. VEQT is the larger fund by AUM.
How are CGRN and VEQT managed?
CGRN is actively managed by CI. It does not track an index. VEQT is actively managed by Vanguard. It does not track an index.
What sectors do CGRN and VEQT emphasize?
CGRN is most exposed to Utilities, Industrials, and Energy. VEQT is most exposed to Technology, Finance, and Industrials.
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: CGRN or VEQT?
Year to date, CGRN has seen +$0.71 M in net flows, compared with +$5,661.14 M for VEQT. VEQT has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of CGRN and VEQT compare?
CGRN has an expense ratio of 0.99%, while VEQT has an expense ratio of 0.24%.
What are the top holdings of CGRN and VEQT?
CGRN's largest holdings include Quanta Services, Inc., Royal Vopak NV, and Northland Power, Inc.. VEQT's top holdings include NVIDIA Corp., Apple, Inc., and Royal Bank of Canada.
Which ETF is more diversified: CGRN or VEQT?
CGRN holds 35 securities, while VEQT holds 11627. On holdings count, VEQT is the more diversified portfolio.
Recent articles about CGRN and VEQT
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.