VS
Compare CI Global Sustainable Infrastructure Fund (CGRN) vs BMO Global Infrastructure Fund Active ETF Series (ZGIF) to find the best fit for your portfolio. CGRN and ZGIF provide the same top sector exposures: Utilities, Industrials, and Energy. When evaluating costs, CGRN features a management fee (MER) of 0.7%, compared to 1.19% for ZGIF. Performance-wise, CGRN has returned 9.63% year-to-date with +$1 M in net flows, whereas ZGIF is at 6.92% with +$2 M. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.
NAV Performance and Flows
Key Data
Compare
CGRN
ZGIF
| AuM | $2.67 M | $3.15 M |
| Management Fees | 0.70% | 1.19% |
| Exp. ratio | 0.99% | 1.16% |
| Tracking Difference | - | - |
Historical performance and flows
As of October 20, 2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | CGRN | -1.13% | -3.68% | +9.63% | +3.99% | +60.93% |
ZGIF | +1.53% | -3.55% | +6.92% | +3.77% | +65.89% | |
| Flows | CGRN | +$0 M | +$0 M | +$1 M | +$1 M | +$1 M |
ZGIF | +$0 M | +$1 M | +$2 M | +$2 M | -$46 M |
CGRN vs ZGIF exposure
Countries
CGRN
USA
24.85%
Canada
17.90%
France
11.36%
Other
45.89%
ZGIF
USA
47.69%
Canada
11.85%
Spain
10.40%
Other
30.05%
Sectors
CGRN
Utilities
50.35%
Industrials
29.63%
Energy
10.30%
Other
9.72%
ZGIF
Utilities
52.57%
Industrials
27.73%
Energy
15.18%
As of October 20, 2026
Top 10 Holdings
CGRN
Quanta Services, Inc.
4.40%
Royal Vopak NV
4.07%
Northland Power, Inc.
3.90%
RWE AG
3.78%
Fortum Oyj
3.63%
CSX Corp.
3.60%
EDP SA
3.58%
APA Group
3.45%
Centrica Plc
3.31%
Ørsted A/S
3.15%
ZGIF
Aena S.M.E. SA
6.33%
NextEra Energy, Inc.
5.38%
Duke Energy Corp.
4.47%
Transurban Group Ltd.
4.44%
Iberdrola SA
4.08%
Enbridge, Inc.
3.76%
The Southern Co.
3.70%
The Williams Cos., Inc.
3.26%
GEK Terna SA
3.16%
Union Pacific Corp.
3.14%
Diversification
CGRN
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 35 total
36.88%
ZGIF
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 38 total
41.70%
Characteristics
Frequently asked questions about CGRN and ZGIF
Which ETF has performed better year to date: CGRN or ZGIF?
As of October 20, 2026, CGRN has returned 9.63% year to date, while ZGIF has returned 6.92%. CGRN is ahead on YTD performance.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: CGRN or ZGIF?
As of October 20, 2026, CGRN manages $2.67 M in assets, while ZGIF manages $3.15 M. ZGIF is the larger fund by AUM.
How are CGRN and ZGIF managed?
CGRN is actively managed by CI. It does not track an index. ZGIF is actively managed by BMO. It does not track an index.
What sectors do CGRN and ZGIF emphasize?
CGRN is most exposed to Utilities, Industrials, and Energy. ZGIF is most exposed to Utilities, Industrials, and Energy.
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: CGRN or ZGIF?
Year to date, CGRN has seen +$0.71 M in net flows, compared with +$2.14 M for ZGIF. ZGIF has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of CGRN and ZGIF compare?
CGRN has an expense ratio of 0.99%, while ZGIF has an expense ratio of 1.16%.
What are the top holdings of CGRN and ZGIF?
CGRN's largest holdings include Quanta Services, Inc., Royal Vopak NV, and Northland Power, Inc.. ZGIF's top holdings include Aena S.M.E. SA, NextEra Energy, Inc., and Duke Energy Corp..
Which ETF is more diversified: CGRN or ZGIF?
CGRN holds 35 securities, while ZGIF holds 38. On holdings count, ZGIF is the more diversified portfolio.
Recent articles about CGRN and ZGIF
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.