VS
Compare CI Gold+ Giants Covered Call ETF (CGXF) vs BMO Covered Call Canadian Banks ETF (ZWB) to find the best fit for your portfolio. CGXF provides Materials exposures, while ZWB is primarily weighted in Financials. When evaluating costs, CGXF features a management fee (MER) of 0.65%, compared to 0.65% for ZWB. Performance-wise, CGXF has returned 7.51% year-to-date with +$76 M in net flows, whereas ZWB is at 21.69% with +$16 M. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.
NAV Performance and Flows
Key Data
Compare
CGXF
ZWB
| AuM | $232.37 M | $4,528.31 M |
| Management Fees | 0.65% | 0.65% |
| Exp. ratio | 0.72% | 0.72% |
| Tracking Difference | - | - |
Historical performance and flows
As of June 12, 2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | CGXF | -15.71% | -18.87% | -7.51% | +36.54% | +115.50% |
ZWB | +7.63% | +20.66% | +21.69% | +56.39% | +109.64% | |
| Flows | CGXF | +$19 M | +$76 M | +$76 M | +$42 M | +$15 M |
ZWB | -$0 M | -$7 M | +$16 M | -$13 M | -$212 M |
CGXF vs ZWB exposure
Countries
CGXF
Canada
52.92%
USA
33.34%
United Kingdom
13.75%
ZWB
Canada
100.25%
Sectors
CGXF
Materials
79.66%
Other
20.34%
ZWB
Financials
100.25%
As of June 12, 2026
Top 10 Holdings
CGXF
NEWMONT CORP
7.16%
KINROSS GOLD
7.15%
GB00BRXH2664
6.98%
PAN AMERICAN
6.94%
ENDEAVOUR MINING
6.77%
US38059T1060
6.76%
WHEATON PRECIOUS METALS CORP
6.73%
HECLA MINING
6.61%
CA06849F1080
6.61%
ROYAL GOLD
6.59%
ZWB
NATIONAL BANK OF CANADA
17.03%
CDN IMPERIAL BK
16.97%
TORONTO DOMINION
16.92%
BNS
16.47%
BANK OF MONTREAL
16.44%
ROYAL BK CANADA
16.43%
Diversification
CGXF
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 15 total
68.30%
ZWB
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 6 total
100.25%
Characteristics
Frequently asked questions about CGXF and ZWB
Which ETF has performed better year to date: CGXF or ZWB?
As of June 12, 2026, CGXF has returned -7.51% year to date, while ZWB has returned 21.69%. ZWB is ahead on YTD performance.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: CGXF or ZWB?
As of June 12, 2026, CGXF manages $232.37 M in assets, while ZWB manages $4.53 B. ZWB is the larger fund by AUM.
How are CGXF and ZWB managed?
CGXF is actively managed by CI. It does not track an index. ZWB is actively managed by BMO. It does not track an index.
What sectors do CGXF and ZWB emphasize?
CGXF is most exposed to Materials. ZWB is most exposed to Financials.
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: CGXF or ZWB?
Year to date, CGXF has seen +$75.87 M in net flows, compared with +$15.68 M for ZWB. CGXF has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of CGXF and ZWB compare?
CGXF has an expense ratio of 0.72%, while ZWB has an expense ratio of 0.72%.
What are the top holdings of CGXF and ZWB?
CGXF's largest holdings include NEWMONT CORP and KINROSS GOLD. ZWB's top holdings include NATIONAL BANK OF CANADA, CDN IMPERIAL BK, and TORONTO DOMINION.
Which ETF is more diversified: CGXF or ZWB?
CGXF holds 13 securities, while ZWB holds 6. On holdings count, CGXF is the more diversified portfolio.
Recent articles about CGXF and ZWB
Unleashing the Potential of Covered Call ETFs
Here's all you need to know about covered call ETFs as a Canadian investor.
Posted on 6/7/2023 by Tony Dong inStock Market
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.