VS
iShares International Fundamental Index ETF (CIE) and Hamilton International Equity YIELD MAXIMIZER ETF (IMAX) offer distinct profiles for Canadian ETF investors. A direct comparison shows that CIE focuses its top 3 sector exposures on Finance, Industrials, and Energy, while IMAX leans towards Finance, Industrials, and Technology. When evaluating costs, CIE features a management fee (MER) of 0.65%, compared to 0.65% for IMAX. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.
NAV Performance and Flows
Key Data
Compare
CIE
IMAX
| AuM | $249.63 M | $24.97 M |
| Management Fees | 0.65% | 0.65% |
| Exp. ratio | 0.72% | 0.65% |
| Tracking Difference | -0.12% | - |
Historical performance and flows
As of September 4, 2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | CIE | +1.51% | +4.16% | +23.02% | +35.47% | +95.36% |
IMAX | -0.63% | +5.50% | - | - | - | |
| Flows | CIE | +$0 M | +$0 M | +$10 M | +$23 M | +$19 M |
IMAX | +$6 M | +$19 M | - | - | - |
CIE vs IMAX exposure
Countries
CIE
Japan
17.80%
United Kingdom
13.44%
Canada
12.27%
France
8.89%
Germany
7.93%
Other
39.67%
IMAX
Japan
23.97%
United Kingdom
13.97%
Switzerland
9.73%
France
8.57%
Germany
8.50%
Other
35.27%
Sectors
CIE
Finance
31.11%
Industrials
11.12%
Energy
9.49%
Technology
9.32%
Non-Energy Materials
8.66%
Consumer Non-Cyclicals
7.29%
Other
23.01%
IMAX
Finance
27.90%
Industrials
16.26%
Technology
12.00%
Healthcare
9.74%
Consumer Non-Cyclicals
8.25%
Non-Energy Materials
7.12%
Other
18.73%
As of September 4, 2026
Top 10 Holdings
CIE
Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.
2.01%
Shell Plc
1.56%
HSBC Holdings Plc
1.16%
Royal Bank of Canada
1.11%
Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group, Inc.
1.02%
The Toronto-Dominion Bank
1.01%
TotalEnergies SE
0.95%
BNP Paribas SA
0.88%
Roche Holding AG
0.86%
Banco Santander SA
0.85%
IMAX
ASML Holding NV
2.73%
HSBC Holdings Plc
1.55%
Roche Holding AG
1.30%
Novartis AG
1.22%
Nestlé SA
1.12%
AstraZeneca PLC
1.10%
Shell Plc
1.06%
Siemens AG
1.02%
Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group, Inc.
1.00%
BHP Group Ltd.
0.89%
Diversification
CIE
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 1,022 total
11.41%
IMAX
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 2,608 total
13.00%
Characteristics
Compare
CIE
IMAX
| Provider | iShares | Hamilton ETFs |
| Management | Passively managed | Actively managed |
| Benchmark | RAFI Fundamental Select Developed ex US 1000 NTR Index - CAD | - |
| Replication Method | Direct (Physical) | |
| Asset Class | Equity | Equity |
| Dividend Policy | Distributing | Distributing |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | 2.09% | - |
| Meets ESG criteria | No | No |
| Inception Date | February 14, 2007 | May 8, 2026 |
Frequently asked questions about CIE and IMAX
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: CIE or IMAX?
As of September 4, 2026, CIE manages $249.63 M in assets, while IMAX manages $24.97 M. CIE is the larger fund by AUM.
How are CIE and IMAX managed?
CIE is passively managed by iShares. It tracks the RAFI Fundamental Select Developed ex US 1000 NTR Index - CAD benchmark. IMAX is actively managed by Hamilton ETFs. It does not track an index.
What sectors do CIE and IMAX emphasize?
CIE is most exposed to Finance, Industrials, and Energy. IMAX is most exposed to Finance, Industrials, and Technology.
How do the fees of CIE and IMAX compare?
CIE has an expense ratio of 0.72%, while IMAX has an expense ratio of 0.65%.
What are the top holdings of CIE and IMAX?
CIE's largest holdings include Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd., Shell Plc, and HSBC Holdings Plc. IMAX's top holdings include ASML Holding NV, HSBC Holdings Plc, and Roche Holding AG.
Which ETF is more diversified: CIE or IMAX?
CIE holds 998 securities, while IMAX holds 2596. On holdings count, IMAX is the more diversified portfolio.
Recent articles about CIE and IMAX
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.