CIE
iShares International Fundamental Index ETF

Full CIE fund page
VS
TQID
TD Q International Dividend ETF

Full TQID fund page

Compare iShares International Fundamental Index ETF (CIE) vs TD Q International Dividend ETF (TQID) to find the best fit for your portfolio. CIE and TQID provide the same top sector exposures: Finance, Industrials, and Technology. When evaluating costs, CIE features a management fee (MER) of 0.65%, compared to 0.4% for TQID. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.

NAV Performance and Flows

-2.0-1.00.01.02.0%Oct 2Oct 9Oct 16Oct 23Oct 30

Key Data

Historical performance and flows

As of November 2, 2026
1M3MYTD1Y3Y
Perf.
CIE
-1.26%-1.49%+19.39%+23.19%+93.17%
TQID
-0.42%----
Flows
CIE
+$0 M+$0 M+$10 M+$14 M+$16 M
TQID
+$1 M----

CIE vs TQID exposure

Countries

CIE
Japan
23.71%
United Kingdom
13.36%
Canada
8.55%
Republic of Korea
7.88%
Germany
7.78%
France
7.71%
Other
31.02%
TQID
Japan
26.09%
United Kingdom
13.70%
France
9.66%
Switzerland
7.90%
Germany
7.62%
Other
35.03%

Sectors

CIE
Finance
23.52%
Industrials
11.56%
Technology
11.39%
Energy
10.59%
Non-Energy Materials
10.03%
Consumer Cyclicals
8.54%
Other
24.38%
TQID
Finance
30.16%
Industrials
17.92%
Technology
10.96%
Healthcare
9.27%
Other
31.70%
As of November 2, 2026

Top 10 Holdings

CIE
Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.
3.60%
Shell Plc
2.24%
TotalEnergies SE
1.43%
HSBC Holdings Plc
1.27%
Roche Holding AG
1.03%
Toyota Motor Corp.
0.96%
BHP Group Ltd.
0.94%
BP Plc
0.89%
Glencore Plc
0.74%
Novartis AG
0.70%
TQID
ASML Holding NV
2.71%
BP Plc
2.13%
Intesa Sanpaolo SpA
2.03%
NatWest Group Plc
1.88%
Japan Tobacco, Inc.
1.80%
HSBC Holdings Plc
1.68%
Nordea Bank Abp
1.65%
Canon, Inc.
1.65%
Daito Trust Construction Co. Ltd.
1.51%
AIB Group plc
1.50%

Diversification

CIE
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 1,011 total
13.80%
TQID
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 171 total
18.54%

Characteristics

Compare
CIE
TQID
ProvideriSharesTD Asset Management
ManagementPassively managedActively managed
BenchmarkRAFI Fundamental Select Developed ex US 1000 NTR Index - CAD-
Replication MethodDirect (Physical)-
Asset ClassEquityEquity
Dividend PolicyDistributingDistributing
Trailing 12m distribution yield2.13%-
Meets ESG criteriaNoNo
Inception DateFebruary 14, 2007July 23, 2026

Frequently asked questions about CIE and TQID

Which ETF is larger by assets under management: CIE or TQID?
As of November 2, 2026, CIE manages $241.45 M in assets, while TQID manages $3.45 M. CIE is the larger fund by AUM.
How are CIE and TQID managed?
CIE is passively managed by iShares. It tracks the RAFI Fundamental Select Developed ex US 1000 NTR Index - CAD benchmark. TQID is actively managed by TD Asset Management. It does not track an index.
What sectors do CIE and TQID emphasize?
CIE is most exposed to Finance, Industrials, and Technology. TQID is most exposed to Finance, Industrials, and Technology.
How do the fees of CIE and TQID compare?
CIE has an expense ratio of 0.72%, while TQID has an expense ratio of 0.40%.
What are the top holdings of CIE and TQID?
CIE's largest holdings include Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd., Shell Plc, and TotalEnergies SE. TQID's top holdings include ASML Holding NV, BP Plc, and Intesa Sanpaolo SpA.
Which ETF is more diversified: CIE or TQID?
CIE holds 1008 securities, while TQID holds 170. On holdings count, CIE is the more diversified portfolio.

Recent articles about CIE and TQID

CboeTrackinsight
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.

All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
diamonds