VS
When evaluating costs, CMR features a management fee (MER) of 0.12%, compared to 0.28% for ZMMK. Performance-wise, CMR has returned 1.34% year-to-date with +$175 M in net flows, whereas ZMMK is at 1.35% with +$160 M. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.
NAV Performance and Flows
Key Data
Compare
CMR
ZMMK
| AuM | $2,688.02 M | $5,834.48 M |
| Management Fees | 0.12% | 0.28% |
| Exp. ratio | 0.13% | 0.13% |
| Tracking Difference | - | - |
Historical performance and flows
As of July 30, 2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | CMR | +0.19% | +0.59% | +1.34% | +2.44% | +11.35% |
ZMMK | +0.19% | +0.59% | +1.35% | +2.44% | +11.61% | |
| Flows | CMR | +$78 M | +$85 M | +$175 M | +$641 M | +$2,148 M |
ZMMK | +$93 M | -$16 M | +$160 M | +$804 M | +$5,142 M |
CMR vs ZMMK exposure
Countries
CMR
Other
92.04%
Canada
7.96%
ZMMK
Exposure data will be available soon
Sectors
CMR
Other
92.04%
Other
7.96%
ZMMK
Exposure data will be available soon
As of July 30, 2026
Top 10 Holdings
CMR
Canada, Bill 29jul2004 6m
2.44%
CA68325JV595
2.32%
Canada, Bill 2oct2003
1.98%
CA55379XVV32
1.23%
CA01306BD681
1.12%
CA89119LU363
1.07%
CMHC, FRN 15sep2026, CAD (99)
1.07%
CA55379XU772
1.04%
CA60689MUY79
0.96%
CA29250PUM09
0.95%
ZMMK
Exposure data will be available soon
Diversification
CMR
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 149 total
14.16%
ZMMK
Exposure data will be available soon
Characteristics
Frequently asked questions about CMR and ZMMK
Which ETF has performed better year to date: CMR or ZMMK?
As of July 30, 2026, CMR has returned 1.34% year to date, while ZMMK has returned 1.35%. ZMMK is ahead on YTD performance.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: CMR or ZMMK?
As of July 30, 2026, CMR manages $2.69 B in assets, while ZMMK manages $5.83 B. ZMMK is the larger fund by AUM.
How are CMR and ZMMK managed?
CMR is actively managed by iShares. It does not track an index. ZMMK is actively managed by BMO. It does not track an index.
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: CMR or ZMMK?
Year to date, CMR has seen +$174.96 M in net flows, compared with +$160.03 M for ZMMK. CMR has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of CMR and ZMMK compare?
CMR has an expense ratio of 0.13%, while ZMMK has an expense ratio of 0.13%.
Recent articles about CMR and ZMMK
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.