CNCL
Global X Enhanced S&P/TSX 60 Covered Call ETF

Full CNCL fund page
VS
XEQT
iShares Core Equity ETF

Full XEQT fund page

When evaluating costs, CNCL features a management fee (MER) of 0.65%, compared to 0.18% for XEQT. Performance-wise, CNCL has returned 16.81% year-to-date with +$2 M in net flows, whereas XEQT is at 12.41% with +$10 B. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.

NAV Performance and Flows

-4.0-2.00.02.04.0%Oct 6Oct 14Oct 21Oct 28Nov 4

Key Data

Historical performance and flows

As of November 6, 2026
1M3MYTD1Y3Y
Perf.
CNCL
+1.92%+0.65%+16.81%+23.85%+68.76%
XEQT
-4.21%-3.34%+12.41%+14.07%+79.74%
Flows
CNCL
+$1 M+$1 M+$2 M+$1 M+$7 M
XEQT
+$1,138 M+$2,986 M+$9,811 M+$10,645 M+$17,548 M

CNCL vs XEQT exposure

Countries

CNCL
Exposure data will be available soon
XEQT
Exposure data will be available soon

Sectors

CNCL
Exposure data will be available soon
XEQT
Exposure data will be available soon
As of November 6, 2026

Top 10 Holdings

CNCL
Exposure data will be available soon
XEQT
Exposure data will be available soon

Diversification

CNCL
Exposure data will be available soon
XEQT
Exposure data will be available soon

Characteristics

Compare
CNCL
XEQT
ProviderGlobal XiShares
ManagementActively managedActively managed
Benchmark--
Replication Method--
Asset ClassEquityEquity
Dividend PolicyDistributingDistributing
Trailing 12m distribution yield8.33%1.63%
Meets ESG criteriaNoNo
Inception DateJuly 6, 2023August 7, 2019

Frequently asked questions about CNCL and XEQT

Which ETF has performed better year to date: CNCL or XEQT?
As of November 6, 2026, CNCL has returned 16.81% year to date, while XEQT has returned 12.41%. CNCL is ahead on YTD performance.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: CNCL or XEQT?
As of November 6, 2026, CNCL manages $19.68 M in assets, while XEQT manages $23.53 B. XEQT is the larger fund by AUM.
How are CNCL and XEQT managed?
CNCL is actively managed by Global X. It does not track an index. XEQT is actively managed by iShares. It does not track an index.
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: CNCL or XEQT?
Year to date, CNCL has seen +$1.87 M in net flows, compared with +$9,810.92 M for XEQT. XEQT has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of CNCL and XEQT compare?
CNCL has an expense ratio of 1.66%, while XEQT has an expense ratio of 0.19%.

Recent articles about CNCL and XEQT

CboeTrackinsight
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.

All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
diamonds