VS
When evaluating costs, CROP features a management fee (MER) of 0.85%, compared to 0.18% for XEQT. Performance-wise, CROP has returned 2.25% year-to-date with +$36 M in net flows, whereas XEQT is at 15.36% with +$9 B. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.
NAV Performance and Flows
Key Data
Compare
CROP
XEQT
| AuM | $305.90 M | $23,502.52 M |
| Management Fees | 0.85% | 0.18% |
| Exp. ratio | 1.97% | 0.19% |
| Tracking Difference | - | - |
Historical performance and flows
As of October 20, 2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | CROP | -0.86% | -1.19% | +2.25% | +2.14% | +30.85% |
XEQT | -1.05% | +2.62% | +15.36% | +16.42% | +90.99% | |
| Flows | CROP | +$13 M | +$23 M | +$36 M | +$45 M | +$176 M |
XEQT | +$925 M | +$2,903 M | +$9,175 M | +$10,289 M | +$16,940 M |
CROP vs XEQT exposure
Countries
CROP
Exposure data will be available soon
XEQT
Exposure data will be available soon
Sectors
CROP
Exposure data will be available soon
XEQT
Exposure data will be available soon
As of October 20, 2026
Top 10 Holdings
CROP
Exposure data will be available soon
XEQT
Exposure data will be available soon
Diversification
CROP
Exposure data will be available soon
XEQT
Exposure data will be available soon
Characteristics
Compare
CROP
XEQT
| Provider | Purpose Investments | iShares |
| Management | Actively managed | Actively managed |
| Benchmark | - | - |
| Replication Method | - | - |
| Asset Class | Equity, Fixed Income | Equity |
| Dividend Policy | Distributing | Distributing |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | 5.10% | 1.59% |
| Meets ESG criteria | No | No |
| Inception Date | September 21, 2021 | August 7, 2019 |
Frequently asked questions about CROP and XEQT
Which ETF has performed better year to date: CROP or XEQT?
As of October 20, 2026, CROP has returned 2.25% year to date, while XEQT has returned 15.36%. XEQT is ahead on YTD performance.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: CROP or XEQT?
As of October 20, 2026, CROP manages $305.90 M in assets, while XEQT manages $23.50 B. XEQT is the larger fund by AUM.
How are CROP and XEQT managed?
CROP is actively managed by Purpose Investments. It does not track an index. XEQT is actively managed by iShares. It does not track an index.
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: CROP or XEQT?
Year to date, CROP has seen +$36.37 M in net flows, compared with +$9,174.84 M for XEQT. XEQT has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of CROP and XEQT compare?
CROP has an expense ratio of 1.97%, while XEQT has an expense ratio of 0.19%.
Recent articles about CROP and XEQT
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.