DGR
CI U.S. Quality Dividend Growth Index ETF

Full DGR fund page
VS
VFV
Vanguard S&P 500 Index ETF

Full VFV fund page

Compare CI U.S. Quality Dividend Growth Index ETF (DGR) vs Vanguard S&P 500 Index ETF (VFV) to find the best fit for your portfolio. DGR provides Information Technology, Communication Services, and Health Care exposures, while VFV is primarily weighted in Information Technology, Communication Services, and Consumer Discretionary. When evaluating costs, DGR features a management fee (MER) of 0.35%, compared to 0.08% for VFV. Performance-wise, DGR has returned 6.84% year-to-date with +$13 M in net flows, whereas VFV is at 11.06% with +$2 B. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.

NAV Performance and Flows

-1.00.01.02.03.04.0%May 12May 20May 27Jun 3Jun 10

Key Data

Historical performance and flows

As of June 12, 2026
1M3MYTD1Y3Y
Perf.
DGR
+0.87%+6.86%+6.84%+15.31%+48.07%
VFV
+2.57%+14.53%+11.06%+27.49%+85.92%
Flows
DGR
-$3 M-$0 M+$13 M+$15 M+$112 M
VFV
+$770 M+$1,469 M+$2,331 M+$4,127 M+$14,330 M

DGR vs VFV exposure

Countries

DGR
USA
99.37%
VFV
USA
96.62%

Sectors

DGR
Information Technology
32.53%
Communication Services
13.47%
Health Care
12.93%
Industrials
9.50%
Consumer Discretionary
7.68%
Other
23.90%
VFV
Information Technology
35.60%
Communication Services
10.96%
Consumer Discretionary
10.09%
Financials
9.73%
Health Care
8.36%
Industrials
8.06%
Other
17.20%
As of June 12, 2026

Top 10 Holdings

DGR
NVIDIA
7.98%
APPLE
5.43%
MICROSOFT-T
4.85%
META PLATFORMS
3.24%
ALPHABET INC-CL
3.05%
ALPHABET INC-CL
3.02%
EXXON
2.96%
COCA-COLA
2.82%
HOME DEPOT
2.63%
UNITEDHEALTH GRP
2.62%
VFV
NVIDIA
7.83%
APPLE
6.44%
MICROSOFT-T
4.89%
AMAZON.COM INC
4.18%
ALPHABET INC-CL
3.62%
BROADCOM LIMITED
3.20%
ALPHABET INC-CL
2.89%
META PLATFORMS
2.16%
TESLA
1.73%
BERKSHIRE HATHWAY
1.40%

Diversification

DGR
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 198 total
38.60%
VFV
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 503 total
38.34%

Characteristics

Compare
DGR
VFV
ProviderCIVanguard
ManagementPassively managedPassively managed
BenchmarkWisdomTree U.S. Quality Dividend Growth CAD Hedged Total Return Index - CADS&P 500 ( CAD NY Rate ) Net Total Return 30% Index - CAD
Replication MethodDirect (Physical)
Asset ClassEquityEquity
Dividend PolicyDistributingDistributing
Trailing 12m distribution yield1.20%0.84%
Meets ESG criteriaNoNo
Inception DateJuly 12, 2016November 2, 2012

Frequently asked questions about DGR and VFV

Which ETF has performed better year to date: DGR or VFV?
As of June 12, 2026, DGR has returned 6.84% year to date, while VFV has returned 11.06%. VFV is ahead on YTD performance.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: DGR or VFV?
As of June 12, 2026, DGR manages $222.19 M in assets, while VFV manages $33.07 B. VFV is the larger fund by AUM.
How are DGR and VFV managed?
DGR is passively managed by CI. It tracks the WisdomTree U.S. Quality Dividend Growth CAD Hedged Total Return Index - CAD benchmark. VFV is passively managed by Vanguard. It tracks the S&P 500 ( CAD NY Rate ) Net Total Return 30% Index - CAD benchmark.
What sectors do DGR and VFV emphasize?
DGR is most exposed to Information Technology, Communication Services, and Health Care. VFV is most exposed to Information Technology, Communication Services, and Consumer Discretionary.
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: DGR or VFV?
Year to date, DGR has seen +$12.65 M in net flows, compared with +$2,331.35 M for VFV. VFV has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of DGR and VFV compare?
DGR has an expense ratio of 0.38%, while VFV has an expense ratio of 0.09%.
What are the top holdings of DGR and VFV?
DGR's largest holdings include NVIDIA, ALPHABET INC-CL, and APPLE. VFV's top holdings include NVIDIA, ALPHABET INC-CL, and APPLE.
Which ETF is more diversified: DGR or VFV?
DGR holds 189 securities, while VFV holds 478. On holdings count, VFV is the more diversified portfolio.

Recent articles about DGR and VFV

CboeTrackinsight
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.

All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
diamonds