When evaluating costs, EBIT features a management fee (MER) of 1%, compared to 0.32% for IBIT.U. Performance-wise, EBIT has returned 12.27% year-to-date with -$17 M in net flows, whereas IBIT.U is at 13.38% with +$5 M. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.
NAV Performance and Flows
Key Data
Compare
EBIT
IBIT.U
| AuM | $183.29 M | $14.13 M |
| Management Fees | 1.00% | 0.32% |
| Exp. ratio | 1.53% | 0.33% |
| Tracking Difference | - | -3.87% |
Historical performance and flows
As of November 5, 2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | EBIT | -12.63% | +18.36% | -12.27% | -27.74% | +114.51% |
IBIT.U | -11.39% | +17.09% | -13.38% | -27.01% | - | |
| Flows | EBIT | -$8 M | -$13 M | -$17 M | -$5 M | -$95 M |
IBIT.U | +$1 M | +$1 M | +$5 M | +$4 M | +$0 M |
EBIT vs IBIT.U exposure
Countries
EBIT
Exposure data will be available soon
IBIT.U
Exposure data will be available soon
Sectors
EBIT
Exposure data will be available soon
IBIT.U
Exposure data will be available soon
As of November 5, 2026
Top 10 Holdings
EBIT
Exposure data will be available soon
IBIT.U
Exposure data will be available soon
Diversification
EBIT
Exposure data will be available soon
IBIT.U
Exposure data will be available soon
Characteristics
Compare
EBIT
IBIT.U
| Provider | Evolve ETFs | iShares |
| Management | Passively managed | Passively managed |
| Benchmark | CME CF Bitcoin Reference Rate Index - USD | CME CF Bitcoin Reference Rate - New York Variant Index - USD |
| Replication Method | Direct (Physical) | Other |
| Asset Class | Cryptocurrencies | Cryptocurrencies |
| Dividend Policy | No income | Distributing |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | 0.00% | 0.00% |
| Meets ESG criteria | No | No |
| Inception Date | February 19, 2021 | January 10, 2025 |
Frequently asked questions about EBIT and IBIT.U
Which ETF has performed better year to date: EBIT or IBIT.U?
As of November 5, 2026, EBIT has returned -12.27% year to date, while IBIT.U has returned -13.38%. EBIT is ahead on YTD performance.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: EBIT or IBIT.U?
As of November 5, 2026, EBIT manages $183.29 M in assets, while IBIT.U manages $14.13 M. EBIT is the larger fund by AUM.
How are EBIT and IBIT.U managed?
EBIT is passively managed by Evolve ETFs. It tracks the CME CF Bitcoin Reference Rate Index - USD benchmark. IBIT.U is passively managed by iShares. It tracks the CME CF Bitcoin Reference Rate - New York Variant Index - USD benchmark.
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: EBIT or IBIT.U?
Year to date, EBIT has seen -$16.53 M in net flows, compared with +$4.60 M for IBIT.U. IBIT.U has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of EBIT and IBIT.U compare?
EBIT has an expense ratio of 1.53%, while IBIT.U has an expense ratio of 0.33%.
Recent articles about EBIT and IBIT.U
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.