VS
When evaluating costs, EQCC features a management fee (MER) of 0.49%, compared to 0.05% for XIC. Performance-wise, EQCC has returned 12.82% year-to-date with +$7 M in net flows, whereas XIC is at 16.19% with +$7 B. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.
NAV Performance and Flows
Key Data
Compare
EQCC
XIC
| AuM | $16.77 M | $33,220.05 M |
| Management Fees | 0.49% | 0.05% |
| Exp. ratio | 0.67% | 0.06% |
| Tracking Difference | - | -0.10% |
Historical performance and flows
As of August 20, 2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | EQCC | +1.60% | +4.97% | +12.82% | +20.30% | - |
XIC | +4.17% | +7.01% | +16.19% | +33.36% | +99.38% | |
| Flows | EQCC | +$3 M | +$4 M | +$7 M | +$2 M | - |
XIC | +$870 M | +$2,088 M | +$7,401 M | +$8,560 M | +$13,546 M |
EQCC vs XIC exposure
Countries
EQCC
Other
100.00%
XIC
Canada
96.25%
Sectors
EQCC
Other
100.00%
XIC
Finance
42.08%
Energy
16.27%
Non-Energy Materials
15.91%
Industrials
8.25%
Other
17.49%
As of August 20, 2026
Top 10 Holdings
EQCC
CA37964A1030
33.09%
CA37962B1031
25.94%
CA37964D1078
20.50%
CA37955S1056
9.02%
CA37962P1027
7.14%
CA37893D1033
4.26%
XIC
Royal Bank of Canada
8.22%
The Toronto-Dominion Bank
5.77%
Shopify, Inc.
3.97%
Bank of Montreal
3.52%
Enbridge, Inc.
3.36%
The Bank of Nova Scotia
3.04%
Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce
3.01%
Brookfield Corp.
2.59%
Canadian Natural Resources Ltd.
2.35%
Agnico Eagle Mines Ltd.
2.25%
Diversification
EQCC
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 6 total
99.95%
XIC
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 221 total
38.08%
Characteristics
Compare
EQCC
XIC
| Provider | Global X | iShares |
| Management | Actively managed | Passively managed |
| Benchmark | - | S&P/TSX Capped Composite Total Return Index - CAD |
| Replication Method | Direct (Physical) | |
| Asset Class | Equity | Equity |
| Dividend Policy | Distributing | Distributing |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | 8.84% | 1.94% |
| Meets ESG criteria | No | No |
| Inception Date | May 28, 2024 | February 16, 2001 |
Frequently asked questions about EQCC and XIC
Which ETF has performed better year to date: EQCC or XIC?
As of August 20, 2026, EQCC has returned 12.82% year to date, while XIC has returned 16.19%. XIC is ahead on YTD performance.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: EQCC or XIC?
As of August 20, 2026, EQCC manages $16.77 M in assets, while XIC manages $33.22 B. XIC is the larger fund by AUM.
How are EQCC and XIC managed?
EQCC is actively managed by Global X. It does not track an index. XIC is passively managed by iShares. It tracks the S&P/TSX Capped Composite Total Return Index - CAD benchmark.
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: EQCC or XIC?
Year to date, EQCC has seen +$6.79 M in net flows, compared with +$7,400.76 M for XIC. XIC has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of EQCC and XIC compare?
EQCC has an expense ratio of 0.67%, while XIC has an expense ratio of 0.06%.
Which ETF is more diversified: EQCC or XIC?
EQCC holds 1 securities, while XIC holds 219. On holdings count, XIC is the more diversified portfolio.
Recent articles about EQCC and XIC
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.