EQCC
Global X All-Equity Asset Allocation Covered Call ETF

Full EQCC fund page
VS
ZEB
BMO Equal Weight Banks Index ETF

Full ZEB fund page

When evaluating costs, EQCC features a management fee (MER) of 0.49%, compared to 0.25% for ZEB. Performance-wise, EQCC has returned 12.82% year-to-date with +$7 M in net flows, whereas ZEB is at 27.55% with -$11 M. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.

NAV Performance and Flows

-4.0-2.00.02.04.0%Jul 20Jul 27Aug 4Aug 11Aug 18

Key Data

Historical performance and flows

As of August 20, 2026
1M3MYTD1Y3Y
Perf.
EQCC
+1.60%+4.97%+12.82%+20.30%-
ZEB
-3.84%+7.74%+27.55%+56.82%+152.62%
Flows
EQCC
+$3 M+$4 M+$7 M+$2 M-
ZEB
-$277 M+$1,174 M-$11 M+$352 M-$1,183 M

EQCC vs ZEB exposure

Countries

EQCC
Other
100.00%
ZEB
Canada
100.00%

Sectors

EQCC
Other
100.00%
ZEB
Finance
100.00%
As of August 20, 2026

Top 10 Holdings

EQCC
CA37964A1030
33.09%
CA37962B1031
25.94%
CA37964D1078
20.50%
CA37955S1056
9.02%
CA37962P1027
7.14%
CA37893D1033
4.26%
ZEB
The Toronto-Dominion Bank
17.42%
Royal Bank of Canada
17.32%
Bank of Montreal
17.15%
The Bank of Nova Scotia
16.61%
Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce
15.79%
National Bank of Canada
15.70%

Diversification

EQCC
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 6 total
99.95%
ZEB
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 6 total
100.00%

Characteristics

Compare
EQCC
ZEB
ProviderGlobal XBMO
ManagementActively managedPassively managed
Benchmark-Solactive Equal Weight Canada Banks GTR Index - CAD
Replication MethodDirect (Physical)
Asset ClassEquityEquity
Dividend PolicyDistributingDistributing
Trailing 12m distribution yield8.84%2.39%
Meets ESG criteriaNoNo
Inception DateMay 28, 2024October 20, 2009

Frequently asked questions about EQCC and ZEB

Which ETF has performed better year to date: EQCC or ZEB?
As of August 20, 2026, EQCC has returned 12.82% year to date, while ZEB has returned 27.55%. ZEB is ahead on YTD performance.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: EQCC or ZEB?
As of August 20, 2026, EQCC manages $16.77 M in assets, while ZEB manages $6.75 B. ZEB is the larger fund by AUM.
How are EQCC and ZEB managed?
EQCC is actively managed by Global X. It does not track an index. ZEB is passively managed by BMO. It tracks the Solactive Equal Weight Canada Banks GTR Index - CAD benchmark.
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: EQCC or ZEB?
Year to date, EQCC has seen +$6.79 M in net flows, compared with -$10.54 M for ZEB. EQCC has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of EQCC and ZEB compare?
EQCC has an expense ratio of 0.67%, while ZEB has an expense ratio of 0.28%.
Which ETF is more diversified: EQCC or ZEB?
EQCC holds 1 securities, while ZEB holds 6. On holdings count, ZEB is the more diversified portfolio.

Recent articles about EQCC and ZEB

CboeTrackinsight
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.

All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
diamonds