VS
When evaluating costs, FBTC features a management fee (MER) of 0.4%, compared to 0.75% for EBIT.U. Performance-wise, FBTC has returned 4.31% year-to-date with +$516 M in net flows, whereas EBIT.U is at 8.89% with -$3 M. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.
NAV Performance and Flows
Key Data
Compare
FBTC
EBIT.U
| AuM | $1,813.72 M | $16.82 M |
| Management Fees | 0.40% | 0.75% |
| Exp. ratio | 0.40% | 1.53% |
| Tracking Difference | - | -1.12% |
Historical performance and flows
As of October 15, 2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | FBTC | +8.34% | +27.56% | -4.31% | -24.50% | +192.71% |
EBIT.U | +6.51% | +23.86% | -8.89% | -28.43% | +175.01% | |
| Flows | FBTC | +$67 M | +$121 M | +$516 M | +$649 M | +$1,460 M |
EBIT.U | -$1 M | -$1 M | -$3 M | -$1 M | -$35 M |
FBTC vs EBIT.U exposure
Countries
FBTC
Exposure data will be available soon
EBIT.U
Exposure data will be available soon
Sectors
FBTC
Exposure data will be available soon
EBIT.U
Exposure data will be available soon
As of October 15, 2026
Top 10 Holdings
FBTC
Exposure data will be available soon
EBIT.U
Exposure data will be available soon
Diversification
FBTC
Exposure data will be available soon
EBIT.U
Exposure data will be available soon
Characteristics
Compare
FBTC
EBIT.U
| Provider | Fidelity | Evolve ETFs |
| Management | Passively managed | Passively managed |
| Benchmark | Fidelity Bitcoin PR Index - USD | CME CF Bitcoin Reference Rate Index - USD |
| Replication Method | Direct (Physical) | Direct (Physical) |
| Asset Class | Cryptocurrencies | Cryptocurrencies |
| Dividend Policy | No income | No income |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | 0.00% | 0.00% |
| Meets ESG criteria | No | No |
| Inception Date | December 2, 2021 | February 19, 2021 |
Frequently asked questions about FBTC and EBIT.U
Which ETF has performed better year to date: FBTC or EBIT.U?
As of October 15, 2026, FBTC has returned -4.31% year to date, while EBIT.U has returned -8.89%. FBTC is ahead on YTD performance.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: FBTC or EBIT.U?
As of October 15, 2026, FBTC manages $1.81 B in assets, while EBIT.U manages $16.82 M. FBTC is the larger fund by AUM.
How are FBTC and EBIT.U managed?
FBTC is passively managed by Fidelity. It tracks the Fidelity Bitcoin PR Index - USD benchmark. EBIT.U is passively managed by Evolve ETFs. It tracks the CME CF Bitcoin Reference Rate Index - USD benchmark.
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: FBTC or EBIT.U?
Year to date, FBTC has seen +$515.62 M in net flows, compared with -$2.63 M for EBIT.U. FBTC has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of FBTC and EBIT.U compare?
FBTC has an expense ratio of 0.40%, while EBIT.U has an expense ratio of 1.53%.
Recent articles about FBTC and EBIT.U
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.