VS
When evaluating costs, FCCV features a management fee (MER) of 0.35%, compared to 0.1% for XDIV. Performance-wise, FCCV has returned 15.99% year-to-date with +$442 M in net flows, whereas XDIV is at 30.3% with +$2 B. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.
NAV Performance and Flows
Key Data
Compare
FCCV
XDIV
| AuM | $1,346.66 M | $6,455.35 M |
| Management Fees | 0.35% | 0.10% |
| Exp. ratio | 0.39% | 0.11% |
| Tracking Difference | -0.52% | 0.95% |
Historical performance and flows
As of October 14, 2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | FCCV | -2.44% | +0.35% | +15.99% | +25.97% | +92.73% |
XDIV | +1.43% | +4.06% | +30.30% | +39.27% | +117.68% | |
| Flows | FCCV | +$39 M | +$130 M | +$442 M | +$539 M | +$933 M |
XDIV | +$164 M | +$427 M | +$1,539 M | +$1,958 M | +$3,608 M |
FCCV vs XDIV exposure
Countries
FCCV
Exposure data will be available soon
XDIV
Canada
95.01%
Sectors
FCCV
Exposure data will be available soon
XDIV
Finance
45.46%
Energy
31.18%
Utilities
8.97%
Other
14.39%
As of October 14, 2026
Top 10 Holdings
FCCV
Exposure data will be available soon
XDIV
The Toronto-Dominion Bank
9.23%
Canadian Natural Resources Ltd.
9.14%
Suncor Energy, Inc.
8.96%
Royal Bank of Canada
8.90%
Manulife Financial Corp.
8.82%
Sun Life Financial, Inc.
8.13%
Power Corp of Canada
6.55%
Pembina Pipeline Corp.
5.26%
Fortis, Inc.
5.22%
Restaurant Brands International, Inc.
4.67%
Diversification
FCCV
Exposure data will be available soon
XDIV
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 21 total
74.88%
Characteristics
Compare
FCCV
XDIV
| Provider | Fidelity | iShares |
| Management | Passively managed | Passively managed |
| Benchmark | Fidelity Canada Canadian Value GTR Index - CAD | MSCI Canada High Dividend Yield 10% Security Capped Net Total Return Index - CAD |
| Replication Method | Direct (Physical) | Direct (Physical) |
| Asset Class | Equity | Equity |
| Dividend Policy | Distributing | Distributing |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | 1.58% | 3.06% |
| Meets ESG criteria | No | No |
| Inception Date | June 10, 2020 | June 7, 2017 |
Frequently asked questions about FCCV and XDIV
Which ETF has performed better year to date: FCCV or XDIV?
As of October 14, 2026, FCCV has returned 15.99% year to date, while XDIV has returned 30.30%. XDIV is ahead on YTD performance.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: FCCV or XDIV?
As of October 14, 2026, FCCV manages $1.35 B in assets, while XDIV manages $6.46 B. XDIV is the larger fund by AUM.
How are FCCV and XDIV managed?
FCCV is passively managed by Fidelity. It tracks the Fidelity Canada Canadian Value GTR Index - CAD benchmark. XDIV is passively managed by iShares. It tracks the MSCI Canada High Dividend Yield 10% Security Capped Net Total Return Index - CAD benchmark.
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: FCCV or XDIV?
Year to date, FCCV has seen +$441.73 M in net flows, compared with +$1,539.18 M for XDIV. XDIV has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of FCCV and XDIV compare?
FCCV has an expense ratio of 0.39%, while XDIV has an expense ratio of 0.11%.
Recent articles about FCCV and XDIV
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.