VS
When evaluating costs, FCCV features a management fee (MER) of 0.35%, compared to 0.15% for XIU. Performance-wise, FCCV has returned 15.99% year-to-date with +$442 M in net flows, whereas XIU is at 15.3% with +$264 M. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.
NAV Performance and Flows
Key Data
Compare
FCCV
XIU
| AuM | $1,346.66 M | $23,391.42 M |
| Management Fees | 0.35% | 0.15% |
| Exp. ratio | 0.39% | 0.17% |
| Tracking Difference | -0.52% | 0.51% |
Historical performance and flows
As of October 14, 2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | FCCV | -2.44% | +0.35% | +15.99% | +25.97% | +92.73% |
XIU | +0.55% | +1.56% | +15.30% | +20.91% | +93.68% | |
| Flows | FCCV | +$39 M | +$130 M | +$442 M | +$539 M | +$933 M |
XIU | +$772 M | -$821 M | +$264 M | +$1,324 M | +$2,582 M |
FCCV vs XIU exposure
Countries
FCCV
Exposure data will be available soon
XIU
Canada
97.63%
Sectors
FCCV
Exposure data will be available soon
XIU
Finance
46.47%
Energy
17.04%
Non-Energy Materials
14.13%
Other
22.36%
As of October 14, 2026
Top 10 Holdings
FCCV
Exposure data will be available soon
XIU
Royal Bank of Canada
9.54%
The Toronto-Dominion Bank
6.75%
Shopify, Inc.
6.00%
Bank of Montreal
3.99%
The Bank of Nova Scotia
3.75%
Enbridge, Inc.
3.69%
Canadian Natural Resources Ltd.
3.49%
Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce
3.49%
Agnico Eagle Mines Ltd.
3.44%
Brookfield Corp.
2.94%
Diversification
FCCV
Exposure data will be available soon
XIU
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 60 total
47.08%
Characteristics
Compare
FCCV
XIU
| Provider | Fidelity | iShares |
| Management | Passively managed | Passively managed |
| Benchmark | Fidelity Canada Canadian Value GTR Index - CAD | S&P / TSX 60 Net Total Return Index - CAD |
| Replication Method | Direct (Physical) | Direct (Physical) |
| Asset Class | Equity | Equity |
| Dividend Policy | Distributing | Distributing |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | 1.58% | 2.13% |
| Meets ESG criteria | No | No |
| Inception Date | June 10, 2020 | September 28, 1999 |
Frequently asked questions about FCCV and XIU
Which ETF has performed better year to date: FCCV or XIU?
As of October 14, 2026, FCCV has returned 15.99% year to date, while XIU has returned 15.30%. FCCV is ahead on YTD performance.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: FCCV or XIU?
As of October 14, 2026, FCCV manages $1.35 B in assets, while XIU manages $23.39 B. XIU is the larger fund by AUM.
How are FCCV and XIU managed?
FCCV is passively managed by Fidelity. It tracks the Fidelity Canada Canadian Value GTR Index - CAD benchmark. XIU is passively managed by iShares. It tracks the S&P / TSX 60 Net Total Return Index - CAD benchmark.
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: FCCV or XIU?
Year to date, FCCV has seen +$441.73 M in net flows, compared with +$264.35 M for XIU. FCCV has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of FCCV and XIU compare?
FCCV has an expense ratio of 0.39%, while XIU has an expense ratio of 0.17%.
Recent articles about FCCV and XIU
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.