VS
When evaluating costs, FCID features a management fee (MER) of 0.45%, compared to 0.22% for VEQT. Performance-wise, FCID has returned 17.23% year-to-date with +$191 M in net flows, whereas VEQT is at 13.11% with +$6 B. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.
NAV Performance and Flows
Key Data
Compare
FCID
VEQT
| AuM | $450.43 M | $17,636.97 M |
| Management Fees | 0.45% | 0.22% |
| Exp. ratio | 0.50% | 0.24% |
| Tracking Difference | -1.99% | - |
Historical performance and flows
As of October 30, 2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | FCID | -1.17% | -0.75% | +17.23% | +21.12% | +84.11% |
VEQT | -2.14% | +0.08% | +13.11% | +14.36% | +88.31% | |
| Flows | FCID | +$46 M | +$76 M | +$191 M | +$224 M | +$314 M |
VEQT | +$517 M | +$1,574 M | +$5,821 M | +$6,475 M | +$10,682 M |
FCID vs VEQT exposure
Countries
FCID
Exposure data will be available soon
VEQT
USA
45.05%
Canada
28.70%
Other
26.25%
Sectors
FCID
Exposure data will be available soon
VEQT
Technology
26.94%
Finance
24.65%
Industrials
9.09%
Non-Energy Materials
8.47%
Energy
7.36%
Other
23.49%
As of October 30, 2026
Top 10 Holdings
FCID
Exposure data will be available soon
VEQT
NVIDIA Corp.
3.24%
Apple, Inc.
3.01%
Microsoft Corp.
2.36%
Royal Bank of Canada
2.34%
The Toronto-Dominion Bank
1.64%
Shopify, Inc.
1.54%
Amazon.com, Inc.
1.50%
Alphabet, Inc.
1.25%
Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co., Ltd.
1.12%
Broadcom Inc.
1.04%
Diversification
FCID
Exposure data will be available soon
VEQT
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 12,230 total
19.05%
Characteristics
Compare
FCID
VEQT
| Provider | Fidelity | Vanguard |
| Management | Passively managed | Actively managed |
| Benchmark | Fidelity Canada International High Dividend Index TR - CAD | - |
| Replication Method | Direct (Physical) | - |
| Asset Class | Equity | Equity |
| Dividend Policy | Distributing | Distributing |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | 3.15% | 1.25% |
| Meets ESG criteria | No | No |
| Inception Date | September 18, 2018 | February 5, 2019 |
Frequently asked questions about FCID and VEQT
Which ETF has performed better year to date: FCID or VEQT?
As of October 30, 2026, FCID has returned 17.23% year to date, while VEQT has returned 13.11%. FCID is ahead on YTD performance.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: FCID or VEQT?
As of October 30, 2026, FCID manages $450.43 M in assets, while VEQT manages $17.64 B. VEQT is the larger fund by AUM.
How are FCID and VEQT managed?
FCID is passively managed by Fidelity. It tracks the Fidelity Canada International High Dividend Index TR - CAD benchmark. VEQT is actively managed by Vanguard. It does not track an index.
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: FCID or VEQT?
Year to date, FCID has seen +$191.42 M in net flows, compared with +$5,820.52 M for VEQT. VEQT has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of FCID and VEQT compare?
FCID has an expense ratio of 0.50%, while VEQT has an expense ratio of 0.24%.
Recent articles about FCID and VEQT
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.