FCIQ
Fidelity International High Quality Index ETF

Full FCIQ fund page
VS
ZEB
BMO Equal Weight Banks Index ETF

Full ZEB fund page

When evaluating costs, FCIQ features a management fee (MER) of 0.45%, compared to 0.25% for ZEB. Performance-wise, FCIQ has returned 15.43% year-to-date with +$488 M in net flows, whereas ZEB is at 29.73% with +$564 M. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.

NAV Performance and Flows

-6.0-5.0-4.0-3.0-2.0-1.00.0%Aug 17Aug 24Aug 31Sep 8Sep 15

Key Data

Historical performance and flows

As of September 15, 2026
1M3MYTD1Y3Y
Perf.
FCIQ
-2.56%+5.52%+15.43%+15.68%+60.68%
ZEB
-4.74%+3.24%+29.73%+49.04%+151.43%
Flows
FCIQ
+$38 M+$122 M+$488 M+$648 M+$1,153 M
ZEB
+$295 M+$1,698 M+$564 M+$1,332 M-$328 M

FCIQ vs ZEB exposure

Countries

FCIQ
Exposure data will be available soon
ZEB
Canada
100.00%

Sectors

FCIQ
Exposure data will be available soon
ZEB
Finance
100.00%
As of September 15, 2026

Top 10 Holdings

FCIQ
Exposure data will be available soon
ZEB
Royal Bank of Canada
17.39%
Bank of Montreal
17.03%
The Toronto-Dominion Bank
16.96%
The Bank of Nova Scotia
16.51%
Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce
16.09%
National Bank of Canada
16.03%

Diversification

FCIQ
Exposure data will be available soon
ZEB
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 6 total
100.00%

Characteristics

Compare
FCIQ
ZEB
ProviderFidelityBMO
ManagementPassively managedPassively managed
BenchmarkFidelity Canada International High Quality GTR Index - CADSolactive Equal Weight Canada Banks GTR Index - CAD
Replication MethodDirect (Physical)Direct (Physical)
Asset ClassEquityEquity
Dividend PolicyDistributingDistributing
Trailing 12m distribution yield1.15%2.36%
Meets ESG criteriaNoNo
Inception DateJanuary 24, 2019October 20, 2009

Frequently asked questions about FCIQ and ZEB

Which ETF has performed better year to date: FCIQ or ZEB?
As of September 15, 2026, FCIQ has returned 15.43% year to date, while ZEB has returned 29.73%. ZEB is ahead on YTD performance.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: FCIQ or ZEB?
As of September 15, 2026, FCIQ manages $1.99 B in assets, while ZEB manages $7.42 B. ZEB is the larger fund by AUM.
How are FCIQ and ZEB managed?
FCIQ is passively managed by Fidelity. It tracks the Fidelity Canada International High Quality GTR Index - CAD benchmark. ZEB is passively managed by BMO. It tracks the Solactive Equal Weight Canada Banks GTR Index - CAD benchmark.
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: FCIQ or ZEB?
Year to date, FCIQ has seen +$488.18 M in net flows, compared with +$564.21 M for ZEB. ZEB has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of FCIQ and ZEB compare?
FCIQ has an expense ratio of 0.51%, while ZEB has an expense ratio of 0.28%.

Recent articles about FCIQ and ZEB

CboeTrackinsight
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.

All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
diamonds
Get ETF updates by email

Never miss the latest Canadian ETF Investing news and updates