VS
When evaluating costs, FCIV features a management fee (MER) of 0.45%, compared to 0.22% for VEQT. Performance-wise, FCIV has returned 18.52% year-to-date with +$1 B in net flows, whereas VEQT is at 15.31% with +$6 B. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.
NAV Performance and Flows
Key Data
Compare
FCIV
VEQT
| AuM | $2,661.47 M | $17,749.36 M |
| Management Fees | 0.45% | 0.22% |
| Exp. ratio | 0.50% | 0.24% |
| Tracking Difference | -1.29% | - |
Historical performance and flows
As of October 16, 2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | FCIV | -0.46% | +0.83% | +18.52% | +25.05% | +88.21% |
VEQT | +1.18% | +1.64% | +15.31% | +17.54% | +86.06% | |
| Flows | FCIV | +$83 M | +$254 M | +$1,031 M | +$1,251 M | +$1,984 M |
VEQT | +$499 M | +$1,643 M | +$5,591 M | +$6,356 M | +$10,481 M |
FCIV vs VEQT exposure
Countries
FCIV
Exposure data will be available soon
VEQT
USA
44.50%
Canada
29.55%
Other
25.95%
Sectors
FCIV
Exposure data will be available soon
VEQT
Technology
25.22%
Finance
25.20%
Industrials
9.16%
Non-Energy Materials
8.97%
Energy
7.65%
Other
23.80%
As of October 16, 2026
Top 10 Holdings
FCIV
Exposure data will be available soon
VEQT
NVIDIA Corp.
3.08%
Apple, Inc.
2.82%
Royal Bank of Canada
2.37%
Microsoft Corp.
2.28%
The Toronto-Dominion Bank
1.68%
Amazon.com, Inc.
1.52%
Shopify, Inc.
1.50%
Alphabet, Inc.
1.21%
Broadcom Inc.
1.06%
Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co., Ltd.
1.03%
Diversification
FCIV
Exposure data will be available soon
VEQT
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 12,159 total
18.55%
Characteristics
Compare
FCIV
VEQT
| Provider | Fidelity | Vanguard |
| Management | Passively managed | Actively managed |
| Benchmark | Fidelity Canada International Value GTR Index - CAD | - |
| Replication Method | Direct (Physical) | - |
| Asset Class | Equity | Equity |
| Dividend Policy | Distributing | Distributing |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | 2.13% | 1.23% |
| Meets ESG criteria | No | No |
| Inception Date | June 10, 2020 | February 5, 2019 |
Frequently asked questions about FCIV and VEQT
Which ETF has performed better year to date: FCIV or VEQT?
As of October 16, 2026, FCIV has returned 18.52% year to date, while VEQT has returned 15.31%. FCIV is ahead on YTD performance.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: FCIV or VEQT?
As of October 16, 2026, FCIV manages $2.66 B in assets, while VEQT manages $17.75 B. VEQT is the larger fund by AUM.
How are FCIV and VEQT managed?
FCIV is passively managed by Fidelity. It tracks the Fidelity Canada International Value GTR Index - CAD benchmark. VEQT is actively managed by Vanguard. It does not track an index.
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: FCIV or VEQT?
Year to date, FCIV has seen +$1,031.03 M in net flows, compared with +$5,590.59 M for VEQT. VEQT has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of FCIV and VEQT compare?
FCIV has an expense ratio of 0.50%, while VEQT has an expense ratio of 0.24%.
Recent articles about FCIV and VEQT
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.