VS
When evaluating costs, FCNS features a management fee (MER) of 0.34%, compared to 0.37% for FBAL. Performance-wise, FCNS has returned 5.8% year-to-date with +$785 M in net flows, whereas FBAL is at 8.16% with +$4 B. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.
NAV Performance and Flows
Key Data
Compare
FCNS
FBAL
| AuM | $2,488.85 M | $10,670.41 M |
| Management Fees | 0.34% | 0.37% |
| Exp. ratio | 0.40% | 0.41% |
| Tracking Difference | - | - |
Historical performance and flows
As of November 5, 2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | FCNS | +0.22% | -1.04% | +5.80% | +4.09% | +37.90% |
FBAL | -0.70% | -1.42% | +8.16% | +7.33% | +52.71% | |
| Flows | FCNS | +$64 M | +$190 M | +$785 M | +$988 M | +$2,178 M |
FBAL | +$317 M | +$872 M | +$3,856 M | +$4,699 M | +$9,133 M |
FCNS vs FBAL exposure
Countries
FCNS
Exposure data will be available soon
FBAL
Exposure data will be available soon
Sectors
FCNS
Exposure data will be available soon
FBAL
Exposure data will be available soon
As of November 5, 2026
Top 10 Holdings
FCNS
Exposure data will be available soon
FBAL
Exposure data will be available soon
Diversification
FCNS
Exposure data will be available soon
FBAL
Exposure data will be available soon
Characteristics
Compare
FCNS
FBAL
| Provider | Fidelity | Fidelity |
| Management | Actively managed | Actively managed |
| Benchmark | - | - |
| Replication Method | - | - |
| Asset Class | Cryptocurrencies, Equity, Fixed Income | Equity, Fixed Income |
| Dividend Policy | Distributing | Distributing |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | 0.00% | 0.00% |
| Meets ESG criteria | No | No |
| Inception Date | January 20, 2022 | January 12, 2021 |
Frequently asked questions about FCNS and FBAL
Which ETF has performed better year to date: FCNS or FBAL?
As of November 5, 2026, FCNS has returned 5.80% year to date, while FBAL has returned 8.16%. FBAL is ahead on YTD performance.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: FCNS or FBAL?
As of November 5, 2026, FCNS manages $2.49 B in assets, while FBAL manages $10.67 B. FBAL is the larger fund by AUM.
How are FCNS and FBAL managed?
FCNS is actively managed by Fidelity. It does not track an index. FBAL is actively managed by Fidelity. It does not track an index.
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: FCNS or FBAL?
Year to date, FCNS has seen +$784.78 M in net flows, compared with +$3,855.58 M for FBAL. FBAL has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of FCNS and FBAL compare?
FCNS has an expense ratio of 0.40%, while FBAL has an expense ratio of 0.41%.
Recent articles about FCNS and FBAL
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.