VS
When evaluating costs, FEQT features a management fee (MER) of 0.38%, compared to 0.09% for HBNK. Performance-wise, FEQT has returned 14.92% year-to-date with +$2 B in net flows, whereas HBNK is at 27.64% with -$514 M. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.
NAV Performance and Flows
Key Data
Compare
FEQT
HBNK
| AuM | $5,718.58 M | $706.91 M |
| Management Fees | 0.38% | 0.09% |
| Exp. ratio | 0.43% | 0.10% |
| Tracking Difference | - | -0.42% |
Historical performance and flows
As of August 20, 2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | FEQT | +2.92% | +5.73% | +14.92% | +21.61% | +89.82% |
HBNK | -3.83% | +7.77% | +27.64% | +57.01% | +153.76% | |
| Flows | FEQT | +$165 M | +$436 M | +$1,819 M | +$2,955 M | +$4,605 M |
HBNK | -$52 M | -$81 M | -$514 M | -$869 M | -$77 M |
FEQT vs HBNK exposure
Countries
FEQT
Exposure data will be available soon
HBNK
Canada
99.94%
Sectors
FEQT
Exposure data will be available soon
HBNK
Finance
99.94%
As of August 20, 2026
Top 10 Holdings
FEQT
Exposure data will be available soon
HBNK
The Toronto-Dominion Bank
17.41%
Royal Bank of Canada
17.34%
Bank of Montreal
17.04%
The Bank of Nova Scotia
16.51%
Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce
15.85%
National Bank of Canada
15.79%
Diversification
FEQT
Exposure data will be available soon
HBNK
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 6 total
99.94%
Characteristics
Compare
FEQT
HBNK
| Provider | Fidelity | Global X |
| Management | Actively managed | Passively managed |
| Benchmark | - | Solactive Equal Weight Canada Banks GTR Index - CAD |
| Replication Method | Direct (Physical) | |
| Asset Class | Cryptocurrencies, Equity | Equity |
| Dividend Policy | Distributing | Distributing |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | 0.00% | 2.67% |
| Meets ESG criteria | No | No |
| Inception Date | January 20, 2022 | July 5, 2023 |
Frequently asked questions about FEQT and HBNK
Which ETF has performed better year to date: FEQT or HBNK?
As of August 20, 2026, FEQT has returned 14.92% year to date, while HBNK has returned 27.64%. HBNK is ahead on YTD performance.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: FEQT or HBNK?
As of August 20, 2026, FEQT manages $5.72 B in assets, while HBNK manages $706.91 M. FEQT is the larger fund by AUM.
How are FEQT and HBNK managed?
FEQT is actively managed by Fidelity. It does not track an index. HBNK is passively managed by Global X. It tracks the Solactive Equal Weight Canada Banks GTR Index - CAD benchmark.
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: FEQT or HBNK?
Year to date, FEQT has seen +$1,818.74 M in net flows, compared with -$513.54 M for HBNK. FEQT has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of FEQT and HBNK compare?
FEQT has an expense ratio of 0.43%, while HBNK has an expense ratio of 0.10%.
Recent articles about FEQT and HBNK
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.