VS
When evaluating costs, FEQT features a management fee (MER) of 0.38%, compared to 0.6% for PRA. Performance-wise, FEQT has returned 15.16% year-to-date with +$2 B in net flows, whereas PRA is at 27.14% with +$131 M. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.
NAV Performance and Flows
Key Data
Compare
FEQT
PRA
| AuM | $5,961.16 M | $262.54 M |
| Management Fees | 0.38% | 0.60% |
| Exp. ratio | 0.43% | 0.73% |
| Tracking Difference | - | - |
Historical performance and flows
As of October 1, 2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | FEQT | +0.72% | +1.70% | +15.16% | +16.19% | +92.92% |
PRA | -2.32% | +5.52% | +27.14% | +31.02% | +72.30% | |
| Flows | FEQT | +$156 M | +$500 M | +$2,049 M | +$2,789 M | +$4,828 M |
PRA | +$25 M | +$44 M | +$131 M | +$147 M | +$153 M |
FEQT vs PRA exposure
Countries
FEQT
Exposure data will be available soon
PRA
Exposure data will be available soon
Sectors
FEQT
Exposure data will be available soon
PRA
Exposure data will be available soon
As of October 1, 2026
Top 10 Holdings
FEQT
Exposure data will be available soon
PRA
Exposure data will be available soon
Diversification
FEQT
Exposure data will be available soon
PRA
Exposure data will be available soon
Characteristics
Compare
FEQT
PRA
| Provider | Fidelity | Purpose Investments |
| Management | Actively managed | Actively managed |
| Benchmark | - | - |
| Replication Method | - | - |
| Asset Class | Cryptocurrencies, Equity | Commodity, Currencies, Equity, Fixed Income |
| Dividend Policy | Distributing | Distributing |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | 0.00% | 2.07% |
| Meets ESG criteria | No | No |
| Inception Date | January 20, 2022 | September 5, 2013 |
Frequently asked questions about FEQT and PRA
Which ETF has performed better year to date: FEQT or PRA?
As of October 1, 2026, FEQT has returned 15.16% year to date, while PRA has returned 27.14%. PRA is ahead on YTD performance.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: FEQT or PRA?
As of October 1, 2026, FEQT manages $5.96 B in assets, while PRA manages $262.54 M. FEQT is the larger fund by AUM.
How are FEQT and PRA managed?
FEQT is actively managed by Fidelity. It does not track an index. PRA is actively managed by Purpose Investments. It does not track an index.
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: FEQT or PRA?
Year to date, FEQT has seen +$2,048.69 M in net flows, compared with +$130.67 M for PRA. FEQT has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of FEQT and PRA compare?
FEQT has an expense ratio of 0.43%, while PRA has an expense ratio of 0.73%.
Recent articles about FEQT and PRA
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.