VS
When evaluating costs, FEQT features a management fee (MER) of 0.38%, compared to 0.75% for RTA. Performance-wise, FEQT has returned 15.16% year-to-date with +$2 B in net flows, whereas RTA is at 11.04% with +$34 M. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.
NAV Performance and Flows
Key Data
Compare
FEQT
RTA
| AuM | $5,961.16 M | $334.72 M |
| Management Fees | 0.38% | 0.75% |
| Exp. ratio | 0.43% | 0.91% |
| Tracking Difference | - | - |
Historical performance and flows
As of October 2, 2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | FEQT | +0.72% | +1.70% | +15.16% | +16.19% | +92.92% |
RTA | +1.12% | +1.46% | +11.04% | +11.85% | +46.39% | |
| Flows | FEQT | +$156 M | +$500 M | +$2,049 M | +$2,789 M | +$4,828 M |
RTA | +$5 M | +$14 M | +$34 M | +$42 M | +$3 M |
FEQT vs RTA exposure
Countries
FEQT
Exposure data will be available soon
RTA
Canada
57.94%
USA
27.37%
Other
13.46%
Sectors
FEQT
Exposure data will be available soon
RTA
Finance
27.78%
Other
13.46%
Technology
10.95%
Sovereign
9.41%
Energy
9.10%
Non-Energy Materials
8.51%
Other
20.79%
As of October 2, 2026
Top 10 Holdings
FEQT
Exposure data will be available soon
RTA
US46090E1038
9.82%
Royal Bank of Canada
4.22%
The Toronto-Dominion Bank
2.97%
Shopify, Inc.
2.62%
CA74643B1031
2.12%
Bank of Montreal
1.77%
The Bank of Nova Scotia
1.67%
Enbridge, Inc.
1.64%
NVIDIA Corp.
1.60%
Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce
1.55%
Diversification
FEQT
Exposure data will be available soon
RTA
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 4,587 total
29.98%
Characteristics
Compare
FEQT
RTA
| Provider | Fidelity | Purpose Investments |
| Management | Actively managed | Actively managed |
| Benchmark | - | - |
| Replication Method | - | - |
| Asset Class | Cryptocurrencies, Equity | Equity, Fixed Income |
| Dividend Policy | Distributing | Distributing |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | 0.00% | 3.57% |
| Meets ESG criteria | No | No |
| Inception Date | January 20, 2022 | May 11, 2017 |
Frequently asked questions about FEQT and RTA
Which ETF has performed better year to date: FEQT or RTA?
As of October 2, 2026, FEQT has returned 15.16% year to date, while RTA has returned 11.04%. FEQT is ahead on YTD performance.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: FEQT or RTA?
As of October 2, 2026, FEQT manages $5.96 B in assets, while RTA manages $334.72 M. FEQT is the larger fund by AUM.
How are FEQT and RTA managed?
FEQT is actively managed by Fidelity. It does not track an index. RTA is actively managed by Purpose Investments. It does not track an index.
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: FEQT or RTA?
Year to date, FEQT has seen +$2,048.69 M in net flows, compared with +$33.52 M for RTA. FEQT has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of FEQT and RTA compare?
FEQT has an expense ratio of 0.43%, while RTA has an expense ratio of 0.91%.
Recent articles about FEQT and RTA
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.