VS
When evaluating costs, FEQT features a management fee (MER) of 0.38%, compared to 0.55% for XTR. Performance-wise, FEQT has returned 14.16% year-to-date with +$2 B in net flows, whereas XTR is at 6.68% with -$17 M. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.
NAV Performance and Flows
Key Data
Compare
FEQT
XTR
| AuM | $5,899.19 M | $362.38 M |
| Management Fees | 0.38% | 0.55% |
| Exp. ratio | 0.43% | 0.60% |
| Tracking Difference | - | - |
Historical performance and flows
As of September 30, 2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | FEQT | -0.07% | +0.82% | +14.16% | +15.49% | +91.26% |
XTR | -1.82% | -1.16% | +6.68% | +8.02% | +40.05% | |
| Flows | FEQT | +$151 M | +$490 M | +$2,038 M | +$2,786 M | +$4,818 M |
XTR | -$2 M | -$9 M | -$17 M | -$13 M | -$117 M |
FEQT vs XTR exposure
Countries
FEQT
Exposure data will be available soon
XTR
Canada
58.86%
USA
36.53%
Sectors
FEQT
Exposure data will be available soon
XTR
Finance
27.90%
Energy
12.17%
Sovereign
8.66%
Consumer Non-Cyclicals
7.40%
Other
43.87%
As of September 30, 2026
Top 10 Holdings
FEQT
Exposure data will be available soon
XTR
ExxonMobil Holdings Corp.
1.47%
Canada, Bonds 3.5% 1dec2057, CAD
1.46%
Royal Bank of Canada
1.39%
Bank of Montreal
1.29%
The Toronto-Dominion Bank
1.20%
Chevron Corp.
1.15%
AbbVie, Inc.
1.14%
The Bank of Nova Scotia
1.12%
Verizon Communications, Inc.
1.05%
Canada, Bond 2 1jan2051 30Y
1.03%
Diversification
FEQT
Exposure data will be available soon
XTR
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 10,127 total
12.30%
Characteristics
Compare
FEQT
XTR
| Provider | Fidelity | iShares |
| Management | Actively managed | Actively managed |
| Benchmark | - | - |
| Replication Method | - | - |
| Asset Class | Cryptocurrencies, Equity | Equity, Fixed Income |
| Dividend Policy | Distributing | Distributing |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | 0.00% | 3.96% |
| Meets ESG criteria | No | No |
| Inception Date | January 20, 2022 | December 19, 2005 |
Frequently asked questions about FEQT and XTR
Which ETF has performed better year to date: FEQT or XTR?
As of September 30, 2026, FEQT has returned 14.16% year to date, while XTR has returned 6.68%. FEQT is ahead on YTD performance.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: FEQT or XTR?
As of September 30, 2026, FEQT manages $5.90 B in assets, while XTR manages $362.38 M. FEQT is the larger fund by AUM.
How are FEQT and XTR managed?
FEQT is actively managed by Fidelity. It does not track an index. XTR is actively managed by iShares. It does not track an index.
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: FEQT or XTR?
Year to date, FEQT has seen +$2,038.12 M in net flows, compared with -$16.97 M for XTR. FEQT has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of FEQT and XTR compare?
FEQT has an expense ratio of 0.43%, while XTR has an expense ratio of 0.60%.
Recent articles about FEQT and XTR
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.