VS
When evaluating costs, FEQT features a management fee (MER) of 0.38%, compared to 0.25% for ZBI. Performance-wise, FEQT has returned 15.16% year-to-date with +$2 B in net flows, whereas ZBI is at 2.16% with +$74 M. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.
NAV Performance and Flows
Key Data
Compare
FEQT
ZBI
| AuM | $5,961.16 M | $238.65 M |
| Management Fees | 0.38% | 0.25% |
| Exp. ratio | 0.43% | 0.27% |
| Tracking Difference | - | -0.26% |
Historical performance and flows
As of October 2, 2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | FEQT | +0.72% | +1.70% | +15.16% | +16.19% | +92.92% |
ZBI | +0.01% | +0.13% | +2.16% | +3.12% | +26.29% | |
| Flows | FEQT | +$156 M | +$500 M | +$2,049 M | +$2,789 M | +$4,828 M |
ZBI | +$20 M | +$70 M | +$74 M | +$122 M | +$222 M |
FEQT vs ZBI exposure
Countries
FEQT
Exposure data will be available soon
ZBI
Canada
100.00%
Sectors
FEQT
Exposure data will be available soon
ZBI
Finance
100.00%
As of October 2, 2026
Top 10 Holdings
FEQT
Exposure data will be available soon
ZBI
Toronto-Dominion Bank, 3.6% 31oct2081, CAD (1)
3.26%
Toronto-Dominion Bank, 7.283% 31oct2082, CAD (2)
3.02%
Bank of Nova Scotia, 7.023% 27jul2082, CAD
2.99%
Toronto-Dominion Bank, 5.918% 31jul2086, CAD (7)
2.50%
Bank of Nova Scotia, 3.7% 27jul2081, CAD (1)
2.49%
Bank of Montreal, 7.325% 26nov2082, CAD (3)
2.06%
Royal Bank of Canada, 3.65% 24nov2081, CAD (3)
1.83%
CIBC, 7.15% 28jul2082, CAD (3)
1.63%
Bank of Montreal, 5.625% 26may2082, CAD (2)
1.47%
Toronto-Dominion Bank, 5.909% 31jan2085, CAD (5)
1.46%
Diversification
FEQT
Exposure data will be available soon
ZBI
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 166 total
22.72%
Characteristics
Compare
FEQT
ZBI
| Provider | Fidelity | BMO |
| Management | Actively managed | Passively managed |
| Benchmark | - | Solactive Canada Bank Income Total Return Index - CAD |
| Replication Method | - | Direct (Physical) |
| Asset Class | Cryptocurrencies, Equity | Equity, Fixed Income |
| Dividend Policy | Distributing | Distributing |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | 0.00% | 4.51% |
| Meets ESG criteria | No | No |
| Inception Date | January 20, 2022 | January 17, 2022 |
Frequently asked questions about FEQT and ZBI
Which ETF has performed better year to date: FEQT or ZBI?
As of October 2, 2026, FEQT has returned 15.16% year to date, while ZBI has returned 2.16%. FEQT is ahead on YTD performance.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: FEQT or ZBI?
As of October 2, 2026, FEQT manages $5.96 B in assets, while ZBI manages $238.65 M. FEQT is the larger fund by AUM.
How are FEQT and ZBI managed?
FEQT is actively managed by Fidelity. It does not track an index. ZBI is passively managed by BMO. It tracks the Solactive Canada Bank Income Total Return Index - CAD benchmark.
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: FEQT or ZBI?
Year to date, FEQT has seen +$2,048.69 M in net flows, compared with +$74.09 M for ZBI. FEQT has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of FEQT and ZBI compare?
FEQT has an expense ratio of 0.43%, while ZBI has an expense ratio of 0.27%.
Recent articles about FEQT and ZBI
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.