When evaluating costs, FEQT features a management fee (MER) of 0.38%, compared to 0.08% for ZSP. Performance-wise, FEQT has returned 9% year-to-date with +$1 B in net flows, whereas ZSP is at 10.41% with +$419 M. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.
NAV Performance and Flows
Key Data
Compare
FEQT
ZSP
| AuM | $4,991.32 M | $23,661.20 M |
| Management Fees | 0.38% | 0.08% |
| Exp. ratio | 0.43% | 0.09% |
| Tracking Difference | - | -0.22% |
Historical performance and flows
As of June 8, 2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | FEQT | +0.37% | +6.55% | +9.00% | +22.32% | +85.46% |
ZSP | +2.18% | +12.21% | +10.41% | +26.91% | +86.05% | |
| Flows | FEQT | +$56 M | +$588 M | +$1,370 M | +$2,991 M | +$4,168 M |
ZSP | -$47 M | +$51 M | +$419 M | +$1,431 M | +$4,964 M |
FEQT vs ZSP exposure
Countries
FEQT
Exposure data will be available soon
ZSP
USA
97.06%
Sectors
FEQT
Exposure data will be available soon
ZSP
Information Technology
36.41%
Communication Services
10.68%
Consumer Discretionary
10.06%
Financials
9.94%
Health Care
8.26%
Industrials
8.01%
Other
16.63%
As of June 8, 2026
Top 10 Holdings
FEQT
Exposure data will be available soon
ZSP
NVIDIA
8.33%
APPLE
6.50%
MICROSOFT-T
5.16%
AMAZON.COM INC
4.21%
ALPHABET INC-CL
3.33%
BROADCOM LIMITED
3.16%
ALPHABET INC-CL
2.67%
META PLATFORMS
2.40%
TESLA
1.72%
BERKSHIRE HATHWAY
1.44%
Diversification
FEQT
Exposure data will be available soon
ZSP
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 502 total
38.91%
Characteristics
Compare
FEQT
ZSP
| Provider | Fidelity | BMO |
| Management | Actively managed | Passively managed |
| Benchmark | - | S&P 500 CAD Total Return Index - CAD |
| Replication Method | Direct (Physical) | |
| Asset Class | Cryptocurrencies, Equity | Equity |
| Dividend Policy | Distributing | Distributing |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | 0.00% | 0.76% |
| Meets ESG criteria | No | No |
| Inception Date | January 20, 2022 | November 14, 2012 |
Frequently asked questions about FEQT and ZSP
Which ETF has performed better year to date: FEQT or ZSP?
As of June 8, 2026, FEQT has returned 9.00% year to date, while ZSP has returned 10.41%. ZSP is ahead on YTD performance.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: FEQT or ZSP?
As of June 8, 2026, FEQT manages $4.99 B in assets, while ZSP manages $23.66 B. ZSP is the larger fund by AUM.
How are FEQT and ZSP managed?
FEQT is actively managed by Fidelity. It does not track an index. ZSP is passively managed by BMO. It tracks the S&P 500 CAD Total Return Index - CAD benchmark.
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: FEQT or ZSP?
Year to date, FEQT has seen +$1,370.12 M in net flows, compared with +$418.96 M for ZSP. FEQT has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of FEQT and ZSP compare?
FEQT has an expense ratio of 0.43%, while ZSP has an expense ratio of 0.09%.
Recent articles about FEQT and ZSP
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.