VS
When evaluating costs, FGCV features a management fee (MER) of 0.85%, compared to 0.08% for ZSP. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.
NAV Performance and Flows
Key Data
Compare
FGCV
ZSP
| AuM | $1.02 M | $23,556.72 M |
| Management Fees | 0.85% | 0.08% |
| Exp. ratio | 0.85% | 0.09% |
| Tracking Difference | - | -0.36% |
Historical performance and flows
As of May 22, 2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | FGCV | - | - | - | - | - |
ZSP | +5.88% | +10.47% | +10.26% | +28.69% | +90.41% | |
| Flows | FGCV | - | - | - | - | - |
ZSP | +$13 M | +$177 M | +$344 M | +$1,502 M | +$4,761 M |
FGCV vs ZSP exposure
Countries
FGCV
Exposure data will be available soon
ZSP
USA
96.98%
Sectors
FGCV
Exposure data will be available soon
ZSP
Information Technology
33.63%
Financials
10.49%
Communication Services
10.10%
Consumer Discretionary
9.94%
Health Care
9.40%
Industrials
8.34%
Other
18.10%
As of May 22, 2026
Top 10 Holdings
FGCV
Exposure data will be available soon
ZSP
NVIDIA
7.39%
APPLE
6.67%
MICROSOFT-T
4.90%
AMAZON.COM INC
3.61%
ALPHABET INC-CL
2.93%
BROADCOM LIMITED
2.56%
ALPHABET INC-CL
2.35%
META PLATFORMS
2.16%
TESLA
1.84%
BERKSHIRE HATHWAY
1.60%
Diversification
FGCV
Exposure data will be available soon
ZSP
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 502 total
36.04%
Characteristics
Compare
FGCV
ZSP
| Provider | Fidelity | BMO |
| Management | Actively managed | Passively managed |
| Benchmark | - | S&P 500 CAD Total Return Index - CAD |
| Replication Method | Direct (Physical) | |
| Asset Class | Equity | Equity |
| Dividend Policy | Distributing | Distributing |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | - | 0.76% |
| Meets ESG criteria | - | No |
| Inception Date | May 13, 2026 | November 14, 2012 |
Frequently asked questions about FGCV and ZSP
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: FGCV or ZSP?
As of May 22, 2026, FGCV manages $1.02 M in assets, while ZSP manages $23.56 B. ZSP is the larger fund by AUM.
How are FGCV and ZSP managed?
FGCV is actively managed by Fidelity. It does not track an index. ZSP is passively managed by BMO. It tracks the S&P 500 CAD Total Return Index - CAD benchmark.
How do the fees of FGCV and ZSP compare?
FGCV has an expense ratio of 0.85%, while ZSP has an expense ratio of 0.09%.
Recent articles about FGCV and ZSP
A Guide to Active vs Passive ETFs for Canadian Investors
Discover the difference between active and passive ETFs in this comprehensive guide. Learn about their strategies, advantages, drawbacks, and how to combine both for a balanced investment approach.
Posted on 7/19/2023 by Tony Dong inETF Ecosystem
BMO ETF Spotlight - More than Just a Bank
BMO is more than just a bank, learn more about BMO’s extensive ETF offerings.
Posted on 3/22/2023 by ETF Market Canada inBanks
The Top Canadian ETFs by AUM in 2023
These ETFs rank among the largest in the Canadian industry.
Posted on 1/11/2023 by Tony Dong inETFs
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.