VS
When evaluating costs, FGLS features a management fee (MER) of 1.15%, compared to 0.08% for ZSP. Performance-wise, FGLS has returned 19.4% year-to-date with -$11 M in net flows, whereas ZSP is at 17.74% with +$1 B. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.
NAV Performance and Flows
Key Data
Compare
FGLS
ZSP
| AuM | $48.43 M | $25,894.93 M |
| Management Fees | 1.15% | 0.08% |
| Exp. ratio | 1.50% | 0.09% |
| Tracking Difference | - | -0.05% |
Historical performance and flows
As of October 15, 2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | FGLS | +7.24% | +16.60% | +19.40% | +37.08% | - |
ZSP | +4.11% | +3.54% | +17.74% | +18.30% | +90.21% | |
| Flows | FGLS | -$10 M | -$10 M | -$11 M | -$5 M | - |
ZSP | +$531 M | +$924 M | +$1,163 M | +$1,964 M | +$5,808 M |
FGLS vs ZSP exposure
Countries
FGLS
Exposure data will be available soon
ZSP
USA
97.65%
Sectors
FGLS
Exposure data will be available soon
ZSP
Technology
45.20%
Finance
13.72%
Healthcare
9.09%
Consumer Non-Cyclicals
8.98%
Industrials
7.57%
Other
15.44%
As of October 15, 2026
Top 10 Holdings
FGLS
Exposure data will be available soon
ZSP
NVIDIA Corp.
7.95%
Apple, Inc.
7.09%
Microsoft Corp.
5.75%
Amazon.com, Inc.
3.93%
Alphabet, Inc.
3.06%
Broadcom Inc.
2.64%
Alphabet, Inc.
2.44%
Meta Platforms, Inc.
1.92%
Micron Technology, Inc.
1.59%
Tesla, Inc.
1.48%
Diversification
FGLS
Exposure data will be available soon
ZSP
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 502 total
37.84%
Characteristics
Compare
FGLS
ZSP
| Provider | Fidelity | BMO |
| Management | Actively managed | Passively managed |
| Benchmark | - | S&P 500 CAD Total Return Index - CAD |
| Replication Method | - | Direct (Physical) |
| Asset Class | Equity | Equity |
| Dividend Policy | Distributing | Distributing |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | 0.00% | 0.76% |
| Meets ESG criteria | No | No |
| Inception Date | February 1, 2024 | November 14, 2012 |
Frequently asked questions about FGLS and ZSP
Which ETF has performed better year to date: FGLS or ZSP?
As of October 15, 2026, FGLS has returned 19.40% year to date, while ZSP has returned 17.74%. FGLS is ahead on YTD performance.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: FGLS or ZSP?
As of October 15, 2026, FGLS manages $48.43 M in assets, while ZSP manages $25.89 B. ZSP is the larger fund by AUM.
How are FGLS and ZSP managed?
FGLS is actively managed by Fidelity. It does not track an index. ZSP is passively managed by BMO. It tracks the S&P 500 CAD Total Return Index - CAD benchmark.
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: FGLS or ZSP?
Year to date, FGLS has seen -$10.76 M in net flows, compared with +$1,163.11 M for ZSP. ZSP has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of FGLS and ZSP compare?
FGLS has an expense ratio of 1.50%, while ZSP has an expense ratio of 0.09%.
Recent articles about FGLS and ZSP
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.