VS
When evaluating costs, FHI features a management fee (MER) of 0.65%, compared to 0.18% for XEQT. Performance-wise, FHI has returned 16.47% year-to-date with +$13 M in net flows, whereas XEQT is at 15.26% with +$9 B. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.
NAV Performance and Flows
Key Data
Compare
FHI
XEQT
| AuM | $127.34 M | $23,787.92 M |
| Management Fees | 0.65% | 0.18% |
| Exp. ratio | 0.72% | 0.19% |
| Tracking Difference | - | - |
Historical performance and flows
As of October 29, 2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | FHI | +6.69% | +8.03% | +16.47% | +21.59% | +41.26% |
XEQT | -0.57% | +2.97% | +15.26% | +16.14% | +91.26% | |
| Flows | FHI | +$2 M | -$16 M | +$13 M | +$9 M | +$40 M |
XEQT | +$1,022 M | +$2,886 M | +$9,480 M | +$10,485 M | +$17,229 M |
FHI vs XEQT exposure
Countries
FHI
Exposure data will be available soon
XEQT
Exposure data will be available soon
Sectors
FHI
Exposure data will be available soon
XEQT
Exposure data will be available soon
As of October 29, 2026
Top 10 Holdings
FHI
Exposure data will be available soon
XEQT
Exposure data will be available soon
Diversification
FHI
Exposure data will be available soon
XEQT
Exposure data will be available soon
Characteristics
Frequently asked questions about FHI and XEQT
Which ETF has performed better year to date: FHI or XEQT?
As of October 29, 2026, FHI has returned 16.47% year to date, while XEQT has returned 15.26%. FHI is ahead on YTD performance.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: FHI or XEQT?
As of October 29, 2026, FHI manages $127.34 M in assets, while XEQT manages $23.79 B. XEQT is the larger fund by AUM.
How are FHI and XEQT managed?
FHI is actively managed by CI. It does not track an index. XEQT is actively managed by iShares. It does not track an index.
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: FHI or XEQT?
Year to date, FHI has seen +$12.51 M in net flows, compared with +$9,480.16 M for XEQT. XEQT has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of FHI and XEQT compare?
FHI has an expense ratio of 0.72%, while XEQT has an expense ratio of 0.19%.
Recent articles about FHI and XEQT
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.