VS
Compare Franklin Innovation Fund (FINO) vs CI Global Alpha Innovation ETF (CINV.U) to find the best fit for your portfolio. FINO provides Technology, Healthcare, and Consumer Non-Cyclicals exposures, while CINV.U is primarily weighted in Technology, Consumer Non-Cyclicals, and Healthcare. When evaluating costs, FINO features a management fee (MER) of 0.95%, compared to 0.8% for CINV.U. Performance-wise, FINO has returned 5.36% year-to-date with +$0 M in net flows, whereas CINV.U is at 16.28% with +$1 M. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.
NAV Performance and Flows
Key Data
Compare
FINO
CINV.U
| AuM | $7.96 M | $2.78 M |
| Management Fees | 0.95% | 0.80% |
| Exp. ratio | 0.90% | 1.07% |
| Tracking Difference | - | - |
Historical performance and flows
As of October 23, 2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | FINO | -8.81% | -1.88% | +5.36% | +2.04% | +92.01% |
CINV.U | -7.81% | +4.34% | +16.28% | +11.32% | +147.18% | |
| Flows | FINO | +$0 M | +$0 M | +$0 M | +$0 M | -$1 M |
CINV.U | +$0 M | +$0 M | +$1 M | +$1 M | +$1 M |
FINO vs CINV.U exposure
Countries
FINO
USA
84.77%
Other
15.23%
CINV.U
USA
77.57%
Other
7.88%
Other
14.54%
Sectors
FINO
Technology
66.55%
Healthcare
10.06%
Consumer Non-Cyclicals
9.63%
Other
13.77%
CINV.U
Technology
56.66%
Consumer Non-Cyclicals
9.05%
Healthcare
8.95%
Industrials
8.05%
Other
7.88%
Finance
7.28%
As of October 23, 2026
Top 10 Holdings
FINO
NVIDIA Corp.
9.77%
Amazon.com, Inc.
8.97%
Alphabet, Inc.
7.06%
Apple, Inc.
4.40%
Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co., Ltd.
4.04%
Meta Platforms, Inc.
3.97%
Broadcom Inc.
3.84%
Microsoft Corp.
3.53%
Sandisk Corp.
2.71%
Lam Research Corp.
2.18%
CINV.U
NVIDIA Corp.
7.37%
Amazon.com, Inc.
5.85%
Microsoft Corp.
5.60%
Meta Platforms, Inc.
4.42%
Alphabet, Inc.
3.90%
Broadcom Inc.
3.82%
ServiceNow, Inc.
3.35%
Apple, Inc.
3.18%
Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co., Ltd.
2.96%
Axon Enterprise, Inc.
2.49%
Diversification
FINO
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 111 total
50.48%
CINV.U
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 49 total
42.93%
Characteristics
Compare
FINO
CINV.U
| Provider | Franklin Templeton | CI |
| Management | Actively managed | Actively managed |
| Benchmark | - | - |
| Replication Method | - | - |
| Asset Class | Equity | Equity |
| Dividend Policy | Distributing | Distributing |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | 0.00% | 0.00% |
| Meets ESG criteria | No | No |
| Inception Date | February 4, 2021 | August 17, 2021 |
Frequently asked questions about FINO and CINV.U
Which ETF has performed better year to date: FINO or CINV.U?
As of October 23, 2026, FINO has returned 5.36% year to date, while CINV.U has returned 16.28%. CINV.U is ahead on YTD performance.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: FINO or CINV.U?
As of October 23, 2026, FINO manages $7.96 M in assets, while CINV.U manages $2.78 M. FINO is the larger fund by AUM.
How are FINO and CINV.U managed?
FINO is actively managed by Franklin Templeton. It does not track an index. CINV.U is actively managed by CI. It does not track an index.
What sectors do FINO and CINV.U emphasize?
FINO is most exposed to Technology, Healthcare, and Consumer Non-Cyclicals. CINV.U is most exposed to Technology, Consumer Non-Cyclicals, and Healthcare.
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: FINO or CINV.U?
Year to date, FINO has seen +$0.00 M in net flows, compared with +$1.33 M for CINV.U. CINV.U has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of FINO and CINV.U compare?
FINO has an expense ratio of 0.90%, while CINV.U has an expense ratio of 1.07%.
What are the top holdings of FINO and CINV.U?
FINO's largest holdings include NVIDIA Corp., Amazon.com, Inc., and Alphabet, Inc.. CINV.U's top holdings include NVIDIA Corp., Amazon.com, Inc., and Microsoft Corp..
Which ETF is more diversified: FINO or CINV.U?
FINO holds 111 securities, while CINV.U holds 49. On holdings count, FINO is the more diversified portfolio.
Recent articles about FINO and CINV.U
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.