VS
Franklin U.S. Large Cap Multifactor Index ETF (CA) (FLUS) and Vanguard Morningstar U.S. Total Market Index ETF (VUN) offer distinct profiles for Canadian ETF investors. A direct comparison shows that FLUS focuses its top 3 sector exposures on Technology, Finance, and Healthcare, while VUN leans towards Technology, Finance, and Healthcare. When evaluating costs, FLUS features a management fee (MER) of 0.25%, compared to 0.15% for VUN. Performance-wise, FLUS has returned 15.33% year-to-date with +$5 M in net flows, whereas VUN is at 13.86% with +$3 B. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.
NAV Performance and Flows
Key Data
Compare
FLUS
VUN
| AuM | $132.84 M | $19,722.98 M |
| Management Fees | 0.25% | 0.15% |
| Exp. ratio | 0.29% | 0.17% |
| Tracking Difference | -0.07% | -0.13% |
Historical performance and flows
As of September 11, 2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | FLUS | -0.83% | +1.59% | +15.33% | +17.86% | +83.03% |
VUN | -1.58% | +2.82% | +13.86% | +17.14% | +78.54% | |
| Flows | FLUS | +$0 M | -$7 M | +$5 M | +$22 M | +$40 M |
VUN | +$426 M | +$1,067 M | +$3,173 M | +$3,941 M | +$7,019 M |
FLUS vs VUN exposure
Countries
FLUS
USA
99.66%
VUN
USA
97.06%
Sectors
FLUS
Technology
45.74%
Finance
12.59%
Healthcare
10.83%
Consumer Non-Cyclicals
8.20%
Industrials
8.08%
Other
14.57%
VUN
Technology
41.21%
Finance
14.86%
Healthcare
9.59%
Consumer Non-Cyclicals
8.73%
Industrials
8.73%
Other
16.88%
As of September 11, 2026
Top 10 Holdings
FLUS
Apple, Inc.
8.22%
NVIDIA Corp.
6.78%
Microsoft Corp.
4.09%
Alphabet, Inc.
3.53%
Amazon.com, Inc.
3.06%
Alphabet, Inc.
2.87%
Broadcom Inc.
2.57%
Johnson & Johnson
2.00%
ExxonMobil Holdings Corp.
2.00%
Meta Platforms, Inc.
1.97%
VUN
NVIDIA Corp.
6.39%
Apple, Inc.
6.28%
Microsoft Corp.
4.78%
Amazon.com, Inc.
3.64%
Alphabet, Inc.
2.89%
Broadcom Inc.
2.55%
Alphabet, Inc.
2.31%
Meta Platforms, Inc.
1.69%
Eli Lilly & Co.
1.35%
JPMorgan Chase & Co.
1.30%
Diversification
FLUS
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 215 total
37.09%
VUN
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 3,428 total
33.17%
Characteristics
Compare
FLUS
VUN
| Provider | Franklin Templeton | Vanguard |
| Management | Passively managed | Passively managed |
| Benchmark | LibertyQ US Large Cap Equity Net Tax Index - CAD | CRSP U.S. Total Market Total Return Index - CAD |
| Replication Method | Direct (Physical) | |
| Asset Class | Equity | Equity |
| Dividend Policy | Distributing | Distributing |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | 0.61% | 0.76% |
| Meets ESG criteria | No | No |
| Inception Date | May 6, 2017 | August 2, 2013 |
Frequently asked questions about FLUS and VUN
Which ETF has performed better year to date: FLUS or VUN?
As of September 11, 2026, FLUS has returned 15.33% year to date, while VUN has returned 13.86%. FLUS is ahead on YTD performance.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: FLUS or VUN?
As of September 11, 2026, FLUS manages $132.84 M in assets, while VUN manages $19.72 B. VUN is the larger fund by AUM.
How are FLUS and VUN managed?
FLUS is passively managed by Franklin Templeton. It tracks the LibertyQ US Large Cap Equity Net Tax Index - CAD benchmark. VUN is passively managed by Vanguard. It tracks the CRSP U.S. Total Market Total Return Index - CAD benchmark.
What sectors do FLUS and VUN emphasize?
FLUS is most exposed to Technology, Finance, and Healthcare. VUN is most exposed to Technology, Finance, and Healthcare.
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: FLUS or VUN?
Year to date, FLUS has seen +$5.18 M in net flows, compared with +$3,172.51 M for VUN. VUN has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of FLUS and VUN compare?
FLUS has an expense ratio of 0.29%, while VUN has an expense ratio of 0.17%.
What are the top holdings of FLUS and VUN?
FLUS's largest holdings include Apple, Inc., NVIDIA Corp., and Alphabet, Inc.. VUN's top holdings include NVIDIA Corp., Apple, Inc., and Alphabet, Inc..
Which ETF is more diversified: FLUS or VUN?
FLUS holds 214 securities, while VUN holds 3324. On holdings count, VUN is the more diversified portfolio.
Recent articles about FLUS and VUN
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.