VS
When evaluating costs, FLX features a management fee (MER) of 0.85%, compared to 0.18% for XEQT. Performance-wise, FLX has returned 0.3% year-to-date with -$3 M in net flows, whereas XEQT is at 16.4% with +$10 B. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.
NAV Performance and Flows
Key Data
Compare
FLX
XEQT
| AuM | $14.76 M | $24,555.49 M |
| Management Fees | 0.85% | 0.18% |
| Exp. ratio | 1.29% | 0.19% |
| Tracking Difference | - | - |
Historical performance and flows
As of November 11, 2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | FLX | +0.84% | -1.23% | -0.30% | +0.07% | +24.32% |
XEQT | -0.52% | -0.02% | +16.40% | +16.62% | +84.32% | |
| Flows | FLX | -$1 M | -$2 M | -$3 M | -$3 M | -$11 M |
XEQT | +$1,153 M | +$3,078 M | +$10,001 M | +$10,786 M | +$17,732 M |
FLX vs XEQT exposure
Countries
FLX
Exposure data will be available soon
XEQT
Exposure data will be available soon
Sectors
FLX
Exposure data will be available soon
XEQT
Exposure data will be available soon
As of November 11, 2026
Top 10 Holdings
FLX
Exposure data will be available soon
XEQT
Exposure data will be available soon
Diversification
FLX
Exposure data will be available soon
XEQT
Exposure data will be available soon
Characteristics
Compare
FLX
XEQT
| Provider | Purpose Investments | iShares |
| Management | Actively managed | Actively managed |
| Benchmark | - | - |
| Replication Method | - | - |
| Asset Class | Fixed Income | Equity |
| Dividend Policy | Distributing | Distributing |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | 8.36% | 1.57% |
| Meets ESG criteria | No | No |
| Inception Date | June 17, 2011 | August 7, 2019 |
Frequently asked questions about FLX and XEQT
Which ETF has performed better year to date: FLX or XEQT?
As of November 11, 2026, FLX has returned -0.30% year to date, while XEQT has returned 16.40%. XEQT is ahead on YTD performance.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: FLX or XEQT?
As of November 11, 2026, FLX manages $14.76 M in assets, while XEQT manages $24.56 B. XEQT is the larger fund by AUM.
How are FLX and XEQT managed?
FLX is actively managed by Purpose Investments. It does not track an index. XEQT is actively managed by iShares. It does not track an index.
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: FLX or XEQT?
Year to date, FLX has seen -$2.52 M in net flows, compared with +$10,000.71 M for XEQT. XEQT has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of FLX and XEQT compare?
FLX has an expense ratio of 1.29%, while XEQT has an expense ratio of 0.19%.
Recent articles about FLX and XEQT
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.