VS
When evaluating costs, GLCC features a management fee (MER) of 0.78%, compared to 0.18% for XEQT. Performance-wise, GLCC has returned 9.03% year-to-date with +$91 M in net flows, whereas XEQT is at 13.72% with +$9 B. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.
NAV Performance and Flows
Key Data
Compare
GLCC
XEQT
| AuM | $578.18 M | $23,313.42 M |
| Management Fees | 0.78% | 0.18% |
| Exp. ratio | 0.76% | 0.19% |
| Tracking Difference | - | - |
Historical performance and flows
As of October 23, 2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | GLCC | -14.97% | +1.81% | -9.03% | +5.37% | +142.23% |
XEQT | -1.96% | +0.95% | +13.72% | +15.34% | +88.64% | |
| Flows | GLCC | +$25 M | +$46 M | +$91 M | +$70 M | +$99 M |
XEQT | +$1,014 M | +$2,871 M | +$9,323 M | +$10,395 M | +$17,085 M |
GLCC vs XEQT exposure
Countries
GLCC
Exposure data will be available soon
XEQT
Exposure data will be available soon
Sectors
GLCC
Exposure data will be available soon
XEQT
Exposure data will be available soon
As of October 23, 2026
Top 10 Holdings
GLCC
Exposure data will be available soon
XEQT
Exposure data will be available soon
Diversification
GLCC
Exposure data will be available soon
XEQT
Exposure data will be available soon
Characteristics
Frequently asked questions about GLCC and XEQT
Which ETF has performed better year to date: GLCC or XEQT?
As of October 23, 2026, GLCC has returned -9.03% year to date, while XEQT has returned 13.72%. XEQT is ahead on YTD performance.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: GLCC or XEQT?
As of October 23, 2026, GLCC manages $578.18 M in assets, while XEQT manages $23.31 B. XEQT is the larger fund by AUM.
How are GLCC and XEQT managed?
GLCC is actively managed by Global X. It does not track an index. XEQT is actively managed by iShares. It does not track an index.
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: GLCC or XEQT?
Year to date, GLCC has seen +$90.63 M in net flows, compared with +$9,322.57 M for XEQT. XEQT has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of GLCC and XEQT compare?
GLCC has an expense ratio of 0.76%, while XEQT has an expense ratio of 0.19%.
Recent articles about GLCC and XEQT
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.