GLDX
Global X Gold Producers Index ETF

Full GLDX fund page
VS
HBNK
Global X Equal Weight Canadian Banks Index ETF

Full HBNK fund page

When evaluating costs, GLDX features a management fee (MER) of 0.4%, compared to 0.09% for HBNK. Performance-wise, GLDX has returned 1.54% year-to-date with -$15 M in net flows, whereas HBNK is at 32.38% with -$510 M. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.

NAV Performance and Flows

-15.0-10.0-5.00.05.0%Oct 6Oct 14Oct 21Oct 28Nov 4

Key Data

Historical performance and flows

As of November 6, 2026
1M3MYTD1Y3Y
Perf.
GLDX
-0.89%+3.92%+1.54%+22.56%-
HBNK
+2.89%-0.97%+32.38%+44.73%+173.10%
Flows
GLDX
+$2 M-$21 M-$15 M-$26 M-
HBNK
-$28 M+$3 M-$510 M-$581 M-$288 M

GLDX vs HBNK exposure

Countries

GLDX
Exposure data will be available soon
HBNK
Canada
99.73%

Sectors

GLDX
Exposure data will be available soon
HBNK
Finance
99.73%
As of November 6, 2026

Top 10 Holdings

GLDX
Exposure data will be available soon
HBNK
The Bank of Nova Scotia
17.08%
The Toronto-Dominion Bank
17.02%
Bank of Montreal
16.77%
Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce
16.48%
Royal Bank of Canada
16.43%
National Bank of Canada
15.95%

Diversification

GLDX
Exposure data will be available soon
HBNK
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 6 total
99.73%

Characteristics

Compare
GLDX
HBNK
ProviderGlobal XGlobal X
ManagementPassively managedPassively managed
BenchmarkMirae Asset North American Listed Gold Producers NTR Index - CADSolactive Equal Weight Canada Banks GTR Index - CAD
Replication MethodDirect (Physical)Direct (Physical)
Asset ClassEquityEquity
Dividend PolicyDistributingDistributing
Trailing 12m distribution yield0.96%2.64%
Meets ESG criteriaNoNo
Inception DateNovember 7, 2024July 5, 2023

Frequently asked questions about GLDX and HBNK

Which ETF has performed better year to date: GLDX or HBNK?
As of November 6, 2026, GLDX has returned 1.54% year to date, while HBNK has returned 32.38%. HBNK is ahead on YTD performance.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: GLDX or HBNK?
As of November 6, 2026, GLDX manages $237.51 M in assets, while HBNK manages $731.73 M. HBNK is the larger fund by AUM.
How are GLDX and HBNK managed?
GLDX is passively managed by Global X. It tracks the Mirae Asset North American Listed Gold Producers NTR Index - CAD benchmark. HBNK is passively managed by Global X. It tracks the Solactive Equal Weight Canada Banks GTR Index - CAD benchmark.
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: GLDX or HBNK?
Year to date, GLDX has seen -$14.85 M in net flows, compared with -$510.41 M for HBNK. GLDX has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of GLDX and HBNK compare?
GLDX has an expense ratio of 0.46%, while HBNK has an expense ratio of 0.10%.

Recent articles about GLDX and HBNK

CboeTrackinsight
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.

All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
diamonds