VS
When evaluating costs, GLDX features a management fee (MER) of 0.4%, compared to 0.09% for HBNK. Performance-wise, GLDX has returned 3.48% year-to-date with -$5 M in net flows, whereas HBNK is at 30.13% with -$429 M. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.
NAV Performance and Flows
Key Data
Compare
GLDX
HBNK
| AuM | $230.64 M | $807.06 M |
| Management Fees | 0.40% | 0.09% |
| Exp. ratio | 0.50% | 0.10% |
| Tracking Difference | -0.58% | -0.41% |
Historical performance and flows
As of June 22, 2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | GLDX | -2.81% | -0.49% | -3.48% | +65.83% | - |
HBNK | +7.85% | +28.77% | +30.13% | +73.22% | - | |
| Flows | GLDX | +$9 M | +$11 M | -$5 M | -$39 M | - |
HBNK | +$3 M | -$178 M | -$429 M | -$680 M | - |
GLDX vs HBNK exposure
Countries
GLDX
Exposure data will be available soon
HBNK
Canada
100.00%
Sectors
GLDX
Exposure data will be available soon
HBNK
Financials
100.00%
As of June 22, 2026
Top 10 Holdings
GLDX
Exposure data will be available soon
HBNK
TORONTO DOMINION
17.52%
ROYAL BK CANADA
17.09%
BANK OF MONTREAL
16.85%
BNS
16.38%
CDN IMPERIAL BK
16.27%
NATIONAL BANK OF CANADA
15.89%
Diversification
GLDX
Exposure data will be available soon
HBNK
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 6 total
100.00%
Characteristics
Compare
GLDX
HBNK
| Provider | Global X | Global X |
| Management | Passively managed | Passively managed |
| Benchmark | Mirae Asset North American Listed Gold Producers NTR Index - CAD | Solactive Equal Weight Canada Banks GTR Index - CAD |
| Replication Method | Direct (Physical) | Direct (Physical) |
| Asset Class | Equity | Equity |
| Dividend Policy | Distributing | Distributing |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | 1.01% | 2.57% |
| Meets ESG criteria | No | No |
| Inception Date | November 7, 2024 | July 5, 2023 |
Frequently asked questions about GLDX and HBNK
Which ETF has performed better year to date: GLDX or HBNK?
As of June 22, 2026, GLDX has returned -3.48% year to date, while HBNK has returned 30.13%. HBNK is ahead on YTD performance.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: GLDX or HBNK?
As of June 22, 2026, GLDX manages $230.64 M in assets, while HBNK manages $807.06 M. HBNK is the larger fund by AUM.
How are GLDX and HBNK managed?
GLDX is passively managed by Global X. It tracks the Mirae Asset North American Listed Gold Producers NTR Index - CAD benchmark. HBNK is passively managed by Global X. It tracks the Solactive Equal Weight Canada Banks GTR Index - CAD benchmark.
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: GLDX or HBNK?
Year to date, GLDX has seen -$4.52 M in net flows, compared with -$429.10 M for HBNK. GLDX has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of GLDX and HBNK compare?
GLDX has an expense ratio of 0.50%, while HBNK has an expense ratio of 0.10%.
Recent articles about GLDX and HBNK
5 Gold Miner ETFs to Play the Bullion Boom
Gold’s rally is strong, but miner ETFs are delivering the real jackpot this year.
Posted on 8/14/2025 by Kyle Anthony inGold
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.