VS
When evaluating costs, GLDX features a management fee (MER) of 0.4%, compared to 0.05% for XIC. Performance-wise, GLDX has returned 1.54% year-to-date with -$15 M in net flows, whereas XIC is at 14.86% with +$11 B. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.
NAV Performance and Flows
Key Data
Compare
GLDX
XIC
| AuM | $237.51 M | $36,690.50 M |
| Management Fees | 0.40% | 0.05% |
| Exp. ratio | 0.46% | 0.06% |
| Tracking Difference | -0.02% | -0.08% |
Historical performance and flows
As of November 6, 2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | GLDX | -0.89% | +3.92% | +1.54% | +22.56% | - |
XIC | +0.52% | -0.46% | +14.86% | +22.43% | +96.06% | |
| Flows | GLDX | +$2 M | -$21 M | -$15 M | -$26 M | - |
XIC | +$1,339 M | +$4,351 M | +$11,447 M | +$12,619 M | +$17,568 M |
GLDX vs XIC exposure
Countries
GLDX
Exposure data will be available soon
XIC
Canada
96.55%
Sectors
GLDX
Exposure data will be available soon
XIC
Finance
41.17%
Non-Energy Materials
18.24%
Energy
16.19%
Industrials
8.03%
Other
16.38%
As of November 6, 2026
Top 10 Holdings
GLDX
Exposure data will be available soon
XIC
Royal Bank of Canada
7.73%
The Toronto-Dominion Bank
5.48%
Shopify, Inc.
5.07%
Bank of Montreal
3.32%
The Bank of Nova Scotia
3.14%
Enbridge, Inc.
2.92%
Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce
2.85%
Canadian Natural Resources Ltd.
2.75%
Agnico Eagle Mines Ltd.
2.63%
Suncor Energy, Inc.
2.25%
Diversification
GLDX
Exposure data will be available soon
XIC
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 216 total
38.13%
Characteristics
Compare
GLDX
XIC
| Provider | Global X | iShares |
| Management | Passively managed | Passively managed |
| Benchmark | Mirae Asset North American Listed Gold Producers NTR Index - CAD | S&P/TSX Capped Composite Total Return Index - CAD |
| Replication Method | Direct (Physical) | Direct (Physical) |
| Asset Class | Equity | Equity |
| Dividend Policy | Distributing | Distributing |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | 0.96% | 1.97% |
| Meets ESG criteria | No | No |
| Inception Date | November 7, 2024 | February 16, 2001 |
Frequently asked questions about GLDX and XIC
Which ETF has performed better year to date: GLDX or XIC?
As of November 6, 2026, GLDX has returned 1.54% year to date, while XIC has returned 14.86%. XIC is ahead on YTD performance.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: GLDX or XIC?
As of November 6, 2026, GLDX manages $237.51 M in assets, while XIC manages $36.69 B. XIC is the larger fund by AUM.
How are GLDX and XIC managed?
GLDX is passively managed by Global X. It tracks the Mirae Asset North American Listed Gold Producers NTR Index - CAD benchmark. XIC is passively managed by iShares. It tracks the S&P/TSX Capped Composite Total Return Index - CAD benchmark.
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: GLDX or XIC?
Year to date, GLDX has seen -$14.85 M in net flows, compared with +$11,446.98 M for XIC. XIC has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of GLDX and XIC compare?
GLDX has an expense ratio of 0.46%, while XIC has an expense ratio of 0.06%.
Recent articles about GLDX and XIC
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.