VS
When evaluating costs, HPF features a management fee (MER) of 0.85%, compared to 0.18% for XEQT. Performance-wise, HPF has returned 54.01% year-to-date with -$0 M in net flows, whereas XEQT is at 15.36% with +$9 B. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.
NAV Performance and Flows
Key Data
Compare
HPF
XEQT
| AuM | $71.66 M | $23,502.52 M |
| Management Fees | 0.85% | 0.18% |
| Exp. ratio | 0.99% | 0.19% |
| Tracking Difference | - | - |
Historical performance and flows
As of October 20, 2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | HPF | +8.92% | +16.13% | +54.01% | +61.40% | +60.04% |
XEQT | -1.05% | +2.62% | +15.36% | +16.42% | +90.99% | |
| Flows | HPF | -$0 M | -$1 M | -$0 M | +$2 M | +$14 M |
XEQT | +$925 M | +$2,903 M | +$9,175 M | +$10,289 M | +$16,940 M |
HPF vs XEQT exposure
Countries
HPF
Exposure data will be available soon
XEQT
Exposure data will be available soon
Sectors
HPF
Exposure data will be available soon
XEQT
Exposure data will be available soon
As of October 20, 2026
Top 10 Holdings
HPF
Exposure data will be available soon
XEQT
Exposure data will be available soon
Diversification
HPF
Exposure data will be available soon
XEQT
Exposure data will be available soon
Characteristics
Compare
HPF
XEQT
| Provider | Harvest Portfolios Group | iShares |
| Management | Actively managed | Actively managed |
| Benchmark | - | - |
| Replication Method | - | - |
| Asset Class | Equity | Equity |
| Dividend Policy | Distributing | Distributing |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | 6.87% | 1.59% |
| Meets ESG criteria | No | No |
| Inception Date | October 21, 2014 | August 7, 2019 |
Frequently asked questions about HPF and XEQT
Which ETF has performed better year to date: HPF or XEQT?
As of October 20, 2026, HPF has returned 54.01% year to date, while XEQT has returned 15.36%. HPF is ahead on YTD performance.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: HPF or XEQT?
As of October 20, 2026, HPF manages $71.66 M in assets, while XEQT manages $23.50 B. XEQT is the larger fund by AUM.
How are HPF and XEQT managed?
HPF is actively managed by Harvest Portfolios Group. It does not track an index. XEQT is actively managed by iShares. It does not track an index.
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: HPF or XEQT?
Year to date, HPF has seen -$0.17 M in net flows, compared with +$9,174.84 M for XEQT. XEQT has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of HPF and XEQT compare?
HPF has an expense ratio of 0.99%, while XEQT has an expense ratio of 0.19%.
Recent articles about HPF and XEQT
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.