VS
Compare Hamilton US Mid-Cap Financials ETF - CAD (HUM) vs BMO Equal Weight U.S. Banks Index ETF (ZUB) to find the best fit for your portfolio. HUM provides Finance and Business Services exposures, while ZUB is primarily weighted in Finance. When evaluating costs, HUM features a management fee (MER) of 0.9%, compared to 0.35% for ZUB. Performance-wise, HUM has returned 2.93% year-to-date with -$8 M in net flows, whereas ZUB is at 4.08% with -$45 M. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.
NAV Performance and Flows
Key Data
Compare
HUM
ZUB
| AuM | $21.10 M | $340.79 M |
| Management Fees | 0.90% | 0.35% |
| Exp. ratio | 0.90% | 0.38% |
| Tracking Difference | - | -0.06% |
Historical performance and flows
As of October 21, 2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | HUM | +0.09% | -2.38% | +2.93% | +7.58% | +73.55% |
ZUB | -2.64% | -7.32% | +4.08% | +16.92% | +121.27% | |
| Flows | HUM | +$0 M | -$1 M | -$8 M | -$11 M | -$11 M |
ZUB | -$0 M | +$34 M | -$45 M | -$87 M | -$360 M |
HUM vs ZUB exposure
Countries
HUM
USA
92.93%
Other
7.07%
ZUB
USA
100.00%
Sectors
HUM
Finance
97.34%
ZUB
Finance
100.00%
As of October 21, 2026
Top 10 Holdings
HUM
LPL Financial Holdings, Inc.
3.60%
Pinnacle Financial Partners, Inc.
3.36%
SouthState Bank Corp.
3.11%
UMB Financial Corp.
3.06%
Palomar Holdings, Inc.
3.03%
Ryan Specialty Holdings, Inc.
3.01%
Old National Bancorp
2.75%
TPG, Inc.
2.51%
Broadridge Financial Solutions, Inc.
2.46%
Houlihan Lokey, Inc.
2.44%
ZUB
Bank of America Corp.
5.82%
The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc.
5.70%
Citigroup, Inc.
5.67%
JPMorgan Chase & Co.
5.61%
East West Bancorp, Inc.
5.53%
Citizens Financial Group, Inc. (Rhode Island)
5.46%
U.S. Bancorp
5.42%
The PNC Financial Services Group, Inc.
5.34%
Fifth Third Bancorp
5.24%
First Citizens BancShares, Inc. (North Carolina)
5.22%
Diversification
HUM
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 62 total
29.32%
ZUB
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 19 total
55.02%
Characteristics
Compare
HUM
ZUB
| Provider | Hamilton ETFs | BMO |
| Management | Actively managed | Passively managed |
| Benchmark | - | Solactive Equal Weight US Bank Canadian Dollar Hedged Net Total Return Index - CAD |
| Replication Method | - | Other |
| Asset Class | Equity | Equity |
| Dividend Policy | Distributing | Distributing |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | 1.30% | 1.88% |
| Meets ESG criteria | No | No |
| Inception Date | June 29, 2020 | May 19, 2010 |
Frequently asked questions about HUM and ZUB
Which ETF has performed better year to date: HUM or ZUB?
As of October 21, 2026, HUM has returned 2.93% year to date, while ZUB has returned 4.08%. ZUB is ahead on YTD performance.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: HUM or ZUB?
As of October 21, 2026, HUM manages $21.10 M in assets, while ZUB manages $340.79 M. ZUB is the larger fund by AUM.
How are HUM and ZUB managed?
HUM is actively managed by Hamilton ETFs. It does not track an index. ZUB is passively managed by BMO. It tracks the Solactive Equal Weight US Bank Canadian Dollar Hedged Net Total Return Index - CAD benchmark.
What sectors do HUM and ZUB emphasize?
HUM is most exposed to Finance and Business Services. ZUB is most exposed to Finance.
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: HUM or ZUB?
Year to date, HUM has seen -$8.27 M in net flows, compared with -$44.60 M for ZUB. HUM has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of HUM and ZUB compare?
HUM has an expense ratio of 0.90%, while ZUB has an expense ratio of 0.38%.
What are the top holdings of HUM and ZUB?
HUM's largest holdings include LPL Financial Holdings, Inc., Pinnacle Financial Partners, Inc., and SouthState Bank Corp.. ZUB's top holdings include Bank of America Corp., The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc., and Citigroup, Inc..
Which ETF is more diversified: HUM or ZUB?
HUM holds 62 securities, while ZUB holds 19. On holdings count, HUM is the more diversified portfolio.
Recent articles about HUM and ZUB
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.